ReviewCureus2025
Emergency Medicine Perspectives on Quality of Life Outcomes After Emergency Laparotomy: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergency laparotomy is a life-saving intervention for acute abdominal conditions, yet its impact on patients' long-term quality of life (QOL) remains poorly understood. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on QOL outcomes following emergency laparotomy, with a focus on emergency medicine perspectives, including recovery trajectories, influencing factors, and implications for clinical practice. A comprehensive search of PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. In total, 11 studies were included, encompassing prospective and retrospective cohorts, cross-sectional surveys, and one randomized controlled trial. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Narrative synthesis was performed due to heterogeneity in QOL measures. Key findings revealed significant variability in QOL recovery. Survivors of peritonitis without malignancy reported acceptable QOL, while cancer and advanced age predicted worse outcomes. Chronic pain affected 19-45% of patients, particularly after small bowel obstruction surgery, and was linked to long-term functional impairment. Laparoscopy improved QOL in elderly patients compared to laparotomy. Frailty and prolonged hospitalization were associated with declines in physical and social functioning. Patient-reported outcome measures were feasible in emergency settings but highlighted unmet needs in psychological and social recovery. Emergency laparotomy significantly impacts QOL, with recovery shaped by surgical approach, comorbidities, and postoperative pain. Standardized QOL assessment, integrated multidisciplinary care, and targeted rehabilitation are needed to optimize long-term outcomes. Future research should prioritize prospective studies with uniform QOL metrics to guide patient-centered interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.