ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
pTx-Pulseq in hybrid sequences: Accessible and advanced hybrid open-source MRI sequences on Philips scanners.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Open-Source, Reproducible MRI Data Acquisition and Reconstruction Workflow Using Pulseq: Multi-Site and Cross-Vendor Validation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Harmonization in magnetic resonance imaging: A survey of acquisition, image-level, and feature-level methods.Medical image analysis · 2026Review
- Highly Reproducible, Vendor-Agnostic, Motion-Insensitive Liver PDFF Mapping at 0.55T, 1.5T, and 3T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- A vendor-neutral functional MRI acquisition protocol for multi-site studies.Aperture neuro · 2026Article
- pTx-Pulseq in hybrid sequences: Accessible and advanced hybrid open-source MRI sequences on Philips scanners.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- A vendor-neutral functional MRI acquisition protocol for multi-site studies.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo enhance the accessibility of advanced pulse sequences, or parts thereof, through the open-source Pulseq framework. This work extends the Pulseq framework to Philips MRI systems and incorporates dynamic parallel-transmit (pTx) capabilities within the constraints of the existing Pulseq format. This enables the hybrid use of Pulseq sequences within the native vendor's scans, leveraging the combined strengths of both approaches. We showcase a new possibility of these techniques: the use of a portable cross-vendor universal pulse (UP) excitation in a native scan.
methodspTx-Pulseq was implemented to add full dynamic pTx within the Pulseq specification. We developed a Pulseq interpreter for Philips systems, supporting both Pulseq-only and hybrid sequences. The hybrid mode was used to integrate a UP from the PASTeUR package into a vendor's native scan. Simulation experiments, safety validations, field measurements, and imaging experiments in phantom and in vivo were conducted to verify the interpreter's and UP's functionality.
resultsThe interpreter executed Pulseq sequences on a Philips 7T system, accurately reproducing gradient waveforms and dynamic pTx sequences. The real-time safety systems operated correctly. Phantom and in vivo scans demonstrated comparable image quality to native sequences, validating the effectiveness of the interpreter and the successful cross-vendor use of universal pulses.
conclusionThe successful cross-vendor application of a universal pulse through pTx-Pulseq in a hybrid sequence demonstrates how advanced MRI techniques can be made accessible. This not only highlights the flexibility and extensibility of Pulseq but also sets the stage for rapid clinical translation of innovative imaging techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.