ArticleJMIR AI2025
Fine-Grained Classification of Pressure Ulcers and Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis Using Multimodal Deep Learning: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.
Article in JMIR AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- EPI-Sense: an integrated hemodynamic sensing and analysis system for early pressure injury warning.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Unimodal and Multimodal Deep Learning for Pressure Injury Identification: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based pressure injury staging: a multicentre study involving 59 hospitals.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Effects of a transformer-based AI-based application to support incontinence-associated dermatitis and pressure injury assessment, nursing care and documentation: Controlled pilot intervention study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Nursing-centered development of an AI-based decision support system in pressure ulcer and incontinence-associated dermatitis management - a mixed methods study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pressure ulcers (PUs) and incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) are prevalent conditions in clinical settings, posing significant challenges due to their similar presentations but differing treatment needs. Accurate differentiation between PUs and IAD is essential for appropriate patient care, yet it remains a burden for nursing staff and wound care experts. Objective: This study aims to develop and introduce a robust multimodal deep learning framework for the classification of PUs and IAD, along with the fine-grained categorization of their respective wound severities, to enhance diagnostic accuracy and support clinical decision-making. Methods: We collected and annotated a dataset of 1555 wound images, achieving consensus among 4 wound experts. Our framework integrates wound images with categorical patient data to improve classification performance. We evaluated 4 models-2 convolutional neural networks and 2 transformer-based architectures-each with approximately 25 million parameters. Various data preprocessing strategies, augmentation techniques, training methods (including multimodal data integration, synthetic data generation, and sampling), and postprocessing approaches (including ensembling and test-time augmentation) were systematically tested to optimize model performance. Results: The transformer-based TinyViT model achieved the highest performance in binary classification of PU and IAD, with an F1-score (harmonic mean of precision and recall) of 93.23%, outperforming wound care experts and nursing staff on the test dataset. In fine-grained classification of wound categories, the TinyViT model also performed best for PU categories with an F1-score of 75.43%, while ConvNeXtV2 showed superior performance in IAD category classification with an F1-score of 53.20%. Incorporating multimodal data improved performance in binary classification but had less impact on fine-grained categorization. Augmentation strategies and training techniques significantly influenced model performance, with ensembling enhancing accuracy across all tasks. Conclusions: Our multimodal deep learning framework effectively differentiates between PUs and IAD, achieving high accuracy and outperforming human wound care experts. By integrating wound images with categorical patient data, the model enhances diagnostic precision, offering a valuable decision-support tool for health care professionals. This advancement has the potential to reduce diagnostic uncertainty, optimize treatment pathways, and alleviate the burden on medical staff, leading to faster interventions and improved patient outcomes. The framework's strong performance suggests practical applications in clinical settings, such as integration into hospital electronic health record systems or mobile applications for bedside diagnostics. Future work should focus on validating real-world implementation, expanding dataset diversity, and refining fine-grained classification capabilities to further enhance clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.