Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40605794›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2025

Fine-Grained Classification of Pressure Ulcers and Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis Using Multimodal Deep Learning: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.

Alexander Brehmer, Constantin Seibold, Jan Egger, Khalid Majjouti, Michaela Tapp-Herrenbrück, Hannah Pinnekamp, Vanessa Priester, Michael Aleithe, Uli Fischer, Bernadette Hosters and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alexander BrehmerInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Essen University Hospital, Girardetstr. 2, Essen, 45131, Germany, 0201 72377829.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-2795-6174
Constantin SeiboldInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Essen University Hospital, Girardetstr. 2, Essen, 45131, Germany, 0201 72377829.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6042-8437
Jan EggerInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Essen University Hospital, Girardetstr. 2, Essen, 45131, Germany, 0201 72377829.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5225-1982
Khalid MajjoutiDepartment of Nursing Development and Nursing Research, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4258-5206
Michaela Tapp-HerrenbrückDepartment of Nursing Development and Nursing Research, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4280-177X
Hannah PinnekampDepartment of Clinical Nursing Research and Quality Management, Hospital of the Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1330-4372
Vanessa PriesterDepartment of Clinical Nursing Research and Quality Management, Hospital of the Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7355-0062
Michael AleitheSciendis GmbH, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8957-9255
Uli FischerDepartment of Clinical Nursing Research and Quality Management, Hospital of the Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1398-6510
Bernadette HostersDepartment of Nursing Development and Nursing Research, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5142-0385
Jens KleesiekInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Essen University Hospital, Girardetstr. 2, Essen, 45131, Germany, 0201 72377829.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8686-0682

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pressure ulcers (PUs) and incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) are prevalent conditions in clinical settings, posing significant challenges due to their similar presentations but differing treatment needs. Accurate differentiation between PUs and IAD is essential for appropriate patient care, yet it remains a burden for nursing staff and wound care experts. Objective: This study aims to develop and introduce a robust multimodal deep learning framework for the classification of PUs and IAD, along with the fine-grained categorization of their respective wound severities, to enhance diagnostic accuracy and support clinical decision-making. Methods: We collected and annotated a dataset of 1555 wound images, achieving consensus among 4 wound experts. Our framework integrates wound images with categorical patient data to improve classification performance. We evaluated 4 models-2 convolutional neural networks and 2 transformer-based architectures-each with approximately 25 million parameters. Various data preprocessing strategies, augmentation techniques, training methods (including multimodal data integration, synthetic data generation, and sampling), and postprocessing approaches (including ensembling and test-time augmentation) were systematically tested to optimize model performance. Results: The transformer-based TinyViT model achieved the highest performance in binary classification of PU and IAD, with an F1-score (harmonic mean of precision and recall) of 93.23%, outperforming wound care experts and nursing staff on the test dataset. In fine-grained classification of wound categories, the TinyViT model also performed best for PU categories with an F1-score of 75.43%, while ConvNeXtV2 showed superior performance in IAD category classification with an F1-score of 53.20%. Incorporating multimodal data improved performance in binary classification but had less impact on fine-grained categorization. Augmentation strategies and training techniques significantly influenced model performance, with ensembling enhancing accuracy across all tasks. Conclusions: Our multimodal deep learning framework effectively differentiates between PUs and IAD, achieving high accuracy and outperforming human wound care experts. By integrating wound images with categorical patient data, the model enhances diagnostic precision, offering a valuable decision-support tool for health care professionals. This advancement has the potential to reduce diagnostic uncertainty, optimize treatment pathways, and alleviate the burden on medical staff, leading to faster interventions and improved patient outcomes. The framework's strong performance suggests practical applications in clinical settings, such as integration into hospital electronic health record systems or mobile applications for bedside diagnostics. Future work should focus on validating real-world implementation, expanding dataset diversity, and refining fine-grained classification capabilities to further enhance clinical utility.

Indexed as

computer visiondeep learningimage classificationincontinence-associated dermatitismulti modal datapressure ulcersynthetic image generationwound classification

Identifiers

PMID40605794
PMCPMC12223690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.