ArticleAnales del sistema sanitario de Navarra2025
[Validation of a questionnaire on knowledge, attitudes, and healthcare approaches to female genital mutilation among nursing students: A pilot study].
Article in Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Female genital mutilation: Reflections from field experience for intercultural health training].Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to develop and validate a self-administered questionnaire to comprehensively assess knowledge, attitudes, and healthcare approaches to female genital mutilation among nursing students. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional pilot study was conducted with third-year nursing students at the Faculty of Nursing, University of Murcia (Cartagena campus, Spain), using convenience sampling. The questionnaire was developed based on an extensive literature review of existing instruments assessing knowledge, attitudes, and healthcare practices related to female genital mutilation. An expert panel individually reviewed the content, and through consensus discussions with the authors, determined which items to include. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha (a).
resultsThirty-seven students participated in the study, 89.2% of whom were females, with ages ranging from 20 to 56 years. About 27% reported no prior professional healthcare experience. The questionnaire comprised 15 single- and multiple-choice questions organized into three dimensions: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Health Approach to female genital mutilation. The overall internal consistency was good with a global a=0.838 (95% CI: 31.00-35.59).
conclusionsPreliminary findings suggest that this questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for assessing nursing student´s knowledge of female genital mutilation, their attitudes towards it, and knowledge about its clinical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.