Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40605560›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2025

Deep Learning Models to Predict Diagnostic and Billing Codes Following Visits to a Family Medicine Practice: Development and Validation Study.

Akshay Rajaram, Michael Judd, David Barber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Akshay RajaramDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, 220 Bagot Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3G2, Canada, 1 613 533 9300.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5310-7843
Michael JuddDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, 220 Bagot Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3G2, Canada, 1 613 533 9300.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-0574-0212
David BarberDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, 220 Bagot Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3G2, Canada, 1 613 533 9300.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8824-6966

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite significant time spent on billing, family physicians routinely make errors and miss billing opportunities. In other disciplines, machine learning models have predicted Current Procedural Terminology codes with high accuracy. Objective: Our objective was to derive machine learning models capable of predicting diagnostic and billing codes from notes recorded in the electronic medical record. Methods: We conducted a retrospective algorithm development and validation study involving an academic family medicine practice. Visits between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2020, containing a physician-authored note and an invoice in the electronic medical record were eligible for inclusion. We trained 2 deep learning models and compared their predictions to codes submitted for reimbursement. We calculated accuracy, recall, precision, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Of the 245,045 visits eligible for inclusion, 198,802 (81%) were included in model development. Accuracy was 99.8% and 99.5% for the diagnostic and billing code models, respectively. Recall was 49.4% and 70.3% for the diagnostic and billing code models, respectively. Precision was 55.3% and 76.7% for the diagnostic and billing code models, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.983 for the diagnostic code model and 0.993 for the billing code model. Conclusions: We developed models capable of predicting diagnostic and billing codes from electronic notes following visits to a family medicine practice. The billing code model outperformed the diagnostic code model in terms of recall and precision, likely due to fewer codes being predicted. Work is underway to further enhance model performance and assess the generalizability of these models to other family medicine practices.

Indexed as

algorithmartificial intelligencebilling codeelectronic health recordelectronic medical recordelectronic notesEMRfamily doctorfamily medicinefamily physicianhealth recordincomemachine learningMLpatient recordpersonal health recordpredictive analyticspredictive modelpredictive systemprimary care

Identifiers

PMID40605560
PMCPMC12231501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.