Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40605556›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2025

Using AI to Translate and Simplify Spanish Orthopedic Medical Text: Instrument Validation Study.

Saman Andalib, Aidin Spina, Bryce Picton, Sean S Solomon, John A Scolaro, Ariana M Nelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comment on 'comparative analysis of artificial intelligence platforms in generating post-operative instructions for endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery'.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saman Andalib *UCI School of Medicine, University of California, 1001 Health Sciences Rd, Irvine, CA, 92617, United States, 1 (949) 824-6119.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-3281-8256
Aidin Spina *UCI School of Medicine, University of California, 1001 Health Sciences Rd, Irvine, CA, 92617, United States, 1 (949) 824-6119.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3994-9646
Bryce PictonUCI School of Medicine, University of California, 1001 Health Sciences Rd, Irvine, CA, 92617, United States, 1 (949) 824-6119.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3539-6167
Sean S SolomonUCI School of Medicine, University of California, 1001 Health Sciences Rd, Irvine, CA, 92617, United States, 1 (949) 824-6119.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4001-6141
John A ScolaroDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Irvine Health, Orange, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7926-5017
Ariana M NelsonDepartment of Anesthesiology, UC Irvine Health, Orange, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1575-1635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Language barriers contribute significantly to health care disparities in the United States, where a sizable proportion of patients are exclusively Spanish speakers. In orthopedic surgery, such barriers impact both patients' comprehension of and patients' engagement with available resources. Studies have explored the utility of large language models (LLMs) for medical translation but have yet to robustly evaluate artificial intelligence (AI)-driven translation and simplification of orthopedic materials for Spanish speakers. Objective: This study used the bilingual evaluation understudy (BLEU) method to assess translation quality and investigated the ability of AI to simplify patient education materials (PEMs) in Spanish. Methods: PEMs (n=78) from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery were translated from English to Spanish, using 2 LLMs (GPT-4 and Google Translate). The BLEU methodology was applied to compare AI translations with professionally human-translated PEMs. The Friedman test and Dunn multiple comparisons test were used to statistically quantify differences in translation quality. A readability analysis and feature analysis were subsequently performed to evaluate text simplification success and the impact of English text features on BLEU scores. The capability of an LLM to simplify medical language written in Spanish was also assessed. Results: As measured by BLEU scores, GPT-4 showed moderate success in translating PEMs into Spanish but was less successful than Google Translate. Simplified PEMs demonstrated improved readability when compared to original versions (P<.001) but were unable to reach the targeted grade level for simplification. The feature analysis revealed that the total number of syllables and average number of syllables per sentence had the highest impact on BLEU scores. GPT-4 was able to significantly reduce the complexity of medical text written in Spanish (P<.001). Conclusions: Although Google Translate outperformed GPT-4 in translation accuracy, LLMs, such as GPT-4, may provide significant utility in translating medical texts into Spanish and simplifying such texts. We recommend considering a dual approach-using Google Translate for translation and GPT-4 for simplification-to improve medical information accessibility and orthopedic surgery education among Spanish-speaking patients.

Indexed as

bilingual evaluation understudyGoogle TranslateGPT-4large language modelsLLMpatient educationtranslation

Identifiers

PMID40605556
PMCPMC12223325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.