Trial reportInternational wound journal2025
Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduces Superficial Surgical Site Infection Risk of Emergency Surgery Patients: Results of a Multicenter Randomised Prospective Clinical Trial.
Trial report in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03716687 (Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for High Risk Laparotomy Wounds. Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for High Risk Laparotomy Wounds. Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Negative-pressure wound therapy in thoracic and abdominal surgery: meta-analysis of randomized trials.BJS open · 2026Pooled it
- Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy after emergency laparotomy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings in emergency laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduces Superficial Surgical Site Infection Risk of Emergency Surgery Patients: Results of a Multicenter Randomised Prospective Clinical Trial.International wound journal · 2025Trial
- Review
- Stenting Versus Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Anastomotic Leakage After Esophago-Gastric Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite modern aseptic precautions, surgical site infection remains a significant problem. Although the benefits of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic wounds are well established, high-level evidence is still lacking on the potential role of negative pressure in the prevention of surgical site infections. We conducted a multicenter, randomised, prospective trial of closed incision vacuum therapy. A total of 90 general surgery patients undergoing emergency laparotomy were enrolled and randomised, 45 cases in the treatment group and 45 cases in the control group. Our aim was to show a significant difference in the rate of surgical site infection between the two groups. In the study group, laparotomy wounds were treated with a single 5-day course of prophylactic vacuum therapy, whereas the control group underwent conventional postoperative wound management with sterile gauze dressings. Ten of the 45 patients in the study group developed a surgical site infection compared to 20 of 45 in the control group (22.2% vs. 44.4% p = 0.025). Upon further analysis, the proportion of superficial SSIs was found to be significantly lower in the ciNPWT group (40% vs. 20% p = 0.038), whereas the difference in deep SSI rates was not statistically significant (4.4% vs. 4.4% p = 1.0). In conclusion, negative pressure wound therapy is not only an effective way to heal chronic wounds, but it's prophylactic use may reduce the overall rate of surgical site infections. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03716687.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.