Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40605450›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Solid Medication Intake in Hospitalised Patients With Dysphagia: A Challenge for Speech and Language Pathologists?

Michaela Trapl-Grundschober, Lea Schneider, Steffen Schulz, Simon Sollereder, Yvonne Teuschl, Walter Struhal, Jürgen Osterbrink

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05173051 (Medication Intake of Solid Dosage Forms), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05173051 nacompletednot on this map

Medication Intake of Solid Dosage Forms: A Risk Factor for Patients With Stroke-induced Dysphagia?

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarl Landsteiner University of Health SciencesRan2022 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsCerebral Infarction, Stroke, Acute, Stroke, DysphagiaArmsSolid Medication intake vs. crushed medication intake
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michaela Trapl-GrundschoberKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3740-9136
Lea SchneiderBrothers of St. John of God Hospital Eisenstadt GmbH, Eisenstadt, Austria.
Steffen SchulzEUFH Campus Rostock, University of Applied Sciences, Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6563-1215
Simon SollerederVASCage Centre on Clinical Stroke Research, Division for Rehabilitation & Recovery, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2551-2366
Yvonne TeuschlDepartment for Clinical Neurosciences and Preventive Medicine, University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1755-7943
Walter StruhalKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7360-7784
Jürgen OsterbrinkParacelsus Medical University, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Program in the Institute for Nursing Science and Practice, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0551-8194

Funding

Karl Landsteiner Privatuniversität für Gesundheitswissenschaften
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSpeech and language pathologists (SLP) are frequently consulted for guidance on the management of oral solid medications. However, the extent to which SLPs consider solid medication intake during swallowing examination remains unclear. The present study endeavoured to find out whether and how SLPs assess patients' ability to swallow solid dosage forms (SDF) in clinical settings, with a specific focus on stroke units.

methodsAn online cross-sectional survey was conducted among SLPs in German-speaking countries. The questionnaire was targeted at SLPs working in hospitals and distributed through both direct outreach and passive dissemination on social networks.

resultsOf 200 returned questionnaires, 147 were eligible for inclusion. Of these, 108 (73.5%) evaluated the swallowing ability of solid oral medications and were further analysed. During clinical swallowing examination, the patient's own medication is most frequently used (63.9%). 92.6% of the 108 SLPs stated that they regularly offer guidance on altering SDFs. SLPs' decision to recommend modified SDFs or pause them is influenced by oral cavity retention of SDFs, pharyngeal phase disorders and SDF intake-related coughing. Additionally, SLPs employ textures that were determined to be safe for accompanying boluses, with fruit puree and water being the most preferred types. Responses of SLPs working on stroke units did not differ significantly from those working on other wards.

conclusionSLPs commonly evaluate the swallowing ability of SDFs. Typically, they utilise the patient's own medications for testing purposes and previously trialled consistencies as accompanying boluses. Specific evaluation and educational programs are needed to enhance the management quality of oral SDFs.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: Registration ID: NCT05173051/Protocol ID: 11TS003721 WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Speech Language Pathologists are crucial in assessing and managing dysphagia. Recent studies and guidelines suggest that it is important for SLPs to evaluate the ability to swallow solid medications. However, there is limited research on whether and how SLPs assess and manage solid dosage forms in patients with dysphagia, especially those with post-stroke dysphagia. Although a few studies have used instrumental assessments like FEES to evaluate pill swallowing, there is a lack of standardised methods. What this paper adds to existing knowledge The findings indicate that almost three-quarters of the surveyed SLPs do evaluate SDFs, with fruit puree and water being the most preferred accompanying boluses. Patients' own medications are more frequently used in clinical swallowing examinations (CSE), whilst placebos are preferred in instrumental assessments. A large majority of SLPs are involved in deciding whether solid medications should be modified for patients with dysphagia. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The research highlights the need for standardised protocols for the evaluation of swallowing SDFs as part of both clinical and instrumental assessments. Additionally, there is a critical need for the establishment of professional and regulatory guidelines to ensure consistent and evidence-based practices among SLPs, potentially improving patient care and medication administration.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersSpeech-Language PathologyAdministration, OralAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDeglutitionFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesdysphagiadysphagia evaluationmedication intakepill dysphagiaspeech and language pathologiststroke

Identifiers

PMID40605450
PMCPMC12223472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.