ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2026
A Machine Learning Approach to Reference Interval Estimation for Red Cell Parameters in a South and East Asian Population.
Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Iron deficiency (ID) and hemoglobinopathies are highly prevalent in Southeast Asia. Accurate estimation of reference intervals (RIs) for red cell parameters is complicated by the need to exclude individuals with these conditions from the reference population. Indirect RI estimations using machine learning could help overcome these challenges. Methods: We developed a binary classification model using eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) to distinguish normal individuals from those with ID, hemoglobinopathies, or other anemias. The model was trained on an annotated dataset comprising 5,520 complete blood count (CBC) results and validated with a holdout dataset of 2,367 CBC results. An independent dataset of 64,100 CBC results was used to identify individuals predicted to be normal, from which RIs were estimated using the refineR algorithm. Results: The XGB model achieved an area under the ROC of 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.96-0.97) for distinguishing between individuals with normal versus abnormal values. Among individuals within the independent dataset, 40,300 (62.9%) were predicted to be normal. The refineR-based reference limits (RLs) derived from this subset approximated those obtained through a direct approach. Improvements in the accuracy of indirect RL estimates were most evident for hematocrit, hemoglobin, and red cell concentrations. Conclusions: Combining XGB with refineR to indirectly derive RIs for red cell parameters improved the accuracy and yielded results comparable with those of directly derived RIs. A further benefit was the capacity to generate sex- and age-specific ranges, which has remained difficult to achieve through direct approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.