ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Genomic language models (gLMs) decode bacterial genomes for improved gene prediction and translation initiation site identification.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Decoding Bacterial N-Terminal Proteoforms: Technologies, Challenges, and Functional Insights.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Benchmarking genomic foundation models for binary classification of gene fusion breakpoints from DNA sequences.BioData mining · 2026Article
- MegaPlantTF: a machine learning framework for comprehensive identification and classification of plant transcription factors.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate bacterial gene prediction is essential for understanding microbial functions and advancing biotechnology. Traditional methods based on sequence homology and statistical models often struggle with complex genetic variations and novel sequences due to their limited ability to interpret the "language of genes." To overcome these challenges, we explore genomic language models (gLMs)-inspired by large language models in natural language processing-to enhance bacterial gene prediction. These models learn patterns and contextual dependencies within genetic sequences, similar to how LLMs process human language. We employ transformers, specifically DNABERT, for bacterial gene prediction using a two-stage framework: first, identifying coding sequence (CDS) regions, and then refining predictions by identifying the correct translation initiation sites (TIS). DNABERT is fine-tuned on a curated set of NCBI complete bacterial genomes using a k-mer tokenizer for sequence processing. Our results show that GeneLM significantly improves gene prediction accuracy. Compared with the leading prokaryotic gene finders, Prodigal, GeneMark-HMM, and Glimmer, and other recent deep learning methods, GeneLM reduces missed CDS predictions while increasing matched annotations. More notably, our TIS predictions surpass traditional methods when tested against experimentally verified sites. GeneLM demonstrates the power of gLMs in decoding genetic information, achieving state-of-the-art performance in bacterial genome analysis. This advancement highlights the potential of language models to revolutionize genome annotation, outperforming conventional tools and enabling more precise genetic insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.