ReviewCurrent protein & peptide science2026
Siglecs: From Biomodulation to Immunotherapy.
Review in Current protein & peptide science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic significance of tumoral Siglec-15 expression in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Molecular Characterization and Expression Analysis ofBiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectins (Siglecs) are cell-surface immunological receptors predominantly expressed on immune cells such as monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. They play a crucial role in regulating inflammatory processes in various diseases and serve as immunological checkpoints in cancer. Despite several immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting Siglecs having entered clinical trials, the number of Siglec-targeted immunotherapies remains limited.
objectiveThis review aims to investigate the contributions of Siglecs in human diseases and explore novel therapeutic strategies targeting the Siglec-sialic acid immunological axis.
methodsThe authors systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for publications mainly from 2015-2025, using search terms related to Siglecs, tumors, autoimmune diseases, and specific Siglec subtypes (CD169, Siglec2). Studies were included if they examined Siglecs biology, immunomodulation, or immunotherapeutic potential. Studies not directly relevant to Siglecs function/therapeutics and non-peer-reviewed materials (conference abstracts, editorials) were excluded. Screening was done via titles and abstracts with data referenced from research article results, and eligible articles underwent full-text review for final inclusion.
resultsThe analysis reveals that Siglecs exhibit dual functions, acting as both activators and inhibitors of immune responses. They are implicated in the pathogenesis of various diseases, including cancer, autoimmune disorders, and viral infections. Several Siglec-targeted immunotherapies are currently in clinical trials, demonstrating their potential in disease management. For instance, Siglec15 and Siglec10 have been identified as potential immune checkpoints in cancer, while Siglec2 and Siglec10 play roles in autoimmune diseases like systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
conclusionSiglecs are key immunomodulators that mediate cell-cell and pathogen interactions, playing pivotal roles in human diseases. Further research into their mechanisms and clinical applications is essential to fully harness their therapeutic potential. Targeting Siglecs offers promising avenues for developing novel immunotherapies, particularly in cancer and autoimmune diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40605153What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.