Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40605137›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2025

Seasonal decomposition and the effect of clothing in Cape Town, South Africa.

Maximilian J Spies, Devin A Finaughty, Louise J Friedling, Victoria E Gibbon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maximilian J SpiesDivision of Clinical Anatomy and Biological Anthropology, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0547-0357
Devin A FinaughtyDivision of Clinical Anatomy and Biological Anthropology, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2585-1189
Louise J FriedlingDivision of Clinical Anatomy and Biological Anthropology, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9127-4266
Victoria E GibbonDivision of Clinical Anatomy and Biological Anthropology, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7875-3297

Funding

South African National Research Foundation 115357South African National Research Foundation 123254University of Cape Town, Faculty of Health Sciences (Discretionary Research Funding)University of Cape Town, Research Contracts and IP (UCT Explorer Funding)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unidentified, unclaimed human remains are a substantial problem in many developing nations, including South Africa. Most forensic cases in Cape Town involve clothed individuals found in thicketed environments. To assist in local medico-legal death investigations, we gathered taphonomic data on six clothed and four unclothed 60 kg porcine bodies as proxies for human decay. This study took place in Delft, Cape Town, over two summers and two winters to assess the impact of seasonal variation, using weight loss, extent of bloat, and vertebrate scavenging as assessment markers. In Cape Town's temperate climate, decomposition in the hotter, drier summer season occurred more rapidly than in the significantly colder and rainier winters, regardless of the presence of clothing (summer vs. winter: 18 vs. 80 days to 68% mass loss, 4 vs. 24 days bloat duration). Double-layer cool-weather clothing caused a notable decrease in decomposition rate and altered scavenging behavior in winter (clothed vs. unclothed: 108 vs. 71 days to 68% mass loss, 364 vs. 622 scavenger visits). Single-layer warm-weather clothing had a comparatively negligible effect in summer (clothed vs. unclothed: 84 vs. 91 days to 68% mass loss, 318 vs. 294 scavenger visits). Although further validation is required, this study provides crucial information for forensic practitioners and researchers in the Cape. Death investigations that do not account for the influence of clothing and vertebrate scavenging on decomposition may be inaccurate, especially in environments where scavengers are known to be highly impactful agents of decay, such as the habitat currently under study.

Indexed as

ClothingPostmortem ChangesSeasonsAnimalsFeeding BehaviorForensic PathologyHumansModels, AnimalSouth AfricaSwinecarriondecay ratesmongoosepostmortem intervaltaphonomyvertebrate scavenging

Identifiers

PMID40605137
PMCPMC12584130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.