ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
The association between week-one red blood cell distribution width and one-year survival in critically ill patients: propensity score-based multicenter analysis.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Red Blood Cell Distribution Width as a Risk Factor for Late Arteriovenous Fistula Thrombosis in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Sex differences in the association between red cell distribution width and 30-day mortality in critically ill patients with acute cholangitis: a retrospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRed blood cell distribution width (RDW), a marker of erythrocyte size variability, has been associated with adverse outcomes in various inflammatory and critical illnesses, but the impact on long-term outcomes in critically ill patients remains unclear. We hence aimed to address the association between RDW and one-year mortality in critically ill patients through using a propensity score-based analysis.
methodsThe data from three databases were aggregated: the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV), the Salzburg Intensive Care database (SICdb), and the Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TCVGH) critical care database. Cox regression, propensity score matching (PSM), and weighting methods consisting of inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), stabilized IPTW, as well as covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) were used to identify the independent association between RDW and one-year mortality.
resultsA total of 39,699 critically ill patients were included in the analysis, with a one-year mortality rate of 27.3%. High RDW was significantly associated with increased one-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.980, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.898-2.066, p < 0.001) after adjusting for covariates. The association was stronger among patients with milder forms of critical illnesses. The association between high RDW and mortality in PSM, IPTW, stabilized IPTW and CBPS populations were 1.751 (95% CI 1.627-1.885), 1.960 (95% CI 1.873-2.051), 1.962 (95% CI 1.875-2.052) and 1.946 (95% CI 1.845-2.053).
conclusionWeek-one RDW is a robust predictor of one-year mortality in critically ill patients. Our data suggest that RDW may serve as a prognostic tool for early risk stratification of long-term outcomes in critical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.