ReviewHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2025
Stem cell-derived gametes: what to expect when expecting their clinical introduction.
Review in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of the metabolome and proteome of stem cell-derived human primordial germ cell-like cells: a multi-omics approach.Biology open · 2026Article
- Human iPSCs derived from cryopreserved testicular somatic cells enable germline regeneration in childhood cancer survivors.Human reproduction open · 2026Article
- The intersection of biology and advanced technologies defines the future of dairy reproductive management.JDS communications · 2025Review
- Generating human primordial germ cell-like cells from pluripotent stem cells: a scoping review ofHuman reproduction open · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stem cell-derived (SCD)-gametes derived from induced or autologous (i.e. patient-specific) cells may help mitigate human fertility problems caused by physiological or social factors in the (near) future. While this technology is still in its infancy, recent advancements with SCD-gametes generated from mouse pluripotent stem cells have led some researchers to expect-and investors to anticipate-the clinical introduction of human gametes derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCD-gametes) within two decades. However, it remains to be investigated how realistic these expectations are, and how they would balance against careful consideration of technical, ethical, legal, and societal aspects, including-but not limited to-safety and effectiveness. This mini-review aims to encourage that investigation by providing a brief overview of the state-of-the-art and highlighting the breadth of issues involved in the potential clinical introduction of human iPSCD-gametes. These issues emerge before (Stage 1), during (Stage 2), and after (Stage 3) clinical trials, and are discussed in that order. Issues discussed in the context of Stage 1 suggest that gathering the evidence required to preclinically assess the safety of human iPSCD-gametes will be time-consuming and require parallel experiments with sensitive research materials. Issues discussed in the context of Stage 2 suggest that it might take several years for human iPSCD-gametes to transition through distinct clinical trial phases, and that inevitable (and unforeseeable) variations in the quality of human iPSCD-gametes are likely to further slow this down. Finally, issues discussed in the context of Stage 3 suggest that offering human iPSCD-gametes clinically will require addressing questions of accountability and monitoring, some of which might be difficult to formalize by law. Combined, these findings suggest that a responsible clinical introduction of human iPSCD-gametes may take considerably longer than expected, underscoring the importance of transdisciplinary collaborations with a broad range of stakeholders to make well-informed and well-considered choices about their development and application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.