Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40605077›Full record

Trial reportHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2025

Association between markers of female adiposity and live birth among patients undergoing fertility treatment or attempting unassisted conception.

Iris T Lee, Kurt T Barnhart, Wei-Ting Hwang, Stefanie N Hinkle, Erica Johnstone, James L Mills, Ellen C Caniglia, Enrique F Schisterman, Pauline Mendola, Ginny L Ryan and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00467363 (The Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00467363 nacompletednot on this map

The Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction: A Multi-center, Controlled, Double-blind Randomized Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)Ran2007 to 2012Enrolled1,228ConditionsBirth, Spontaneous AbortionArmsacetylsalicylic-acid (aspirin), Folic acid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Iris T LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4319-4429
Kurt T BarnhartDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Wei-Ting HwangDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Stefanie N HinkleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4312-708X
Erica JohnstoneDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
James L MillsEpidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ellen C CanigliaDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Enrique F SchistermanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Pauline MendolaEpidemiology and Environmental Health, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5330-2844
Ginny L RyanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jim HotalingCenter for Reproductive Urology and Men's Health, Departments of Surgery (Urology) and Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
C Matthew PetersonDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Bradley J Van VoorhisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Sunni L MumfordDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0133-3176

Funding

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland HHSN275201300026I/HHSN27500008National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland HHSN275201300026I/HHSN27500018NICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201200007CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201300026INICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201500001C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionBeyond BMI, are there better predictors of the impact of high female adiposity on reproductive outcomes in patients undergoing fertility treatment or attempting unassisted conception? SUMMARY ANSWER: Though BMI remains a predictor of fertility outcomes, alternative markers of adiposity, such as percent body fat, provide distinct information and may be more strongly associated with outcomes than BMI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Elevated BMI is associated with a lower probability of live birth, though randomized trials have not consistently demonstrated the efficacy of weight loss for increasing live birth among patients utilizing infertility treatment. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a secondary analysis of data gathered from 2013 to 2017 during the Folic Acid and Zinc Supplementation Trial (FAZST). Participants in FAZST included 2370 heterosexual couples seeking infertility care at four US fertility centers. Couples were followed for 9 months while undergoing fertility treatments or attempting unassisted conception, with up to 9 additional months of follow-up if pregnancy occurred. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsFor inclusion in the present study, female participants must have had at least one marker of adiposity measured at their baseline visit for FAZST. The primary exposure was high adiposity (defined by commonly used cutoffs in the literature) by each of five markers: BMI, percent body fat measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), serum leptin, serum adiponectin/leptin ratio, and waist circumference. Of the participants in FAZST, BMI was available for 99.6%, percent body fat for 7.3% (DXA only offered to 218 participants at two study sites between 2016 and 2017), leptin for 89.7%, adiponectin/leptin ratio for 89.7%, and waist circumference for 90.9%. Generalized linear models including age, race, parity, education, physical activity, male partner BMI ≥30 kg/m2, and Healthy Eating Index were used to estimate the relative risk of live birth. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: High adiposity by BMI was associated with decreased probability of live birth (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.98). The other markers demonstrated similar associations, though a stronger effect size was seen with percent body fat (aRR 0.34, 95% CI 0.22-0.55). In an analysis by tertile, even moderately elevated percent body fat was associated with a decrease in live birth. When stratifying by infertility treatment status, associations were attenuated for most markers in the group utilizing infertility treatment, though percent body fat remained significantly associated with live birth. However, this marker was only available in a subset of participants. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Only a subset of participants underwent DXA scans and had data on percent body fat, limiting the generalizability of the finding that this marker was most strongly associated with live birth. There were few participants with low BMIs, limiting the ability to draw conclusions on how low adiposity may affect reproductive outcomes. Findings may not be generalizable to the non-infertility population. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThe findings support prior data that high adiposity is associated with a lower probability of live birth. While most markers of adiposity performed similarly to BMI, there may be a role for percent body fat as an alternative assessment of adiposity, particularly among patients utilizing infertility treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The FAZST and Impact of Diet, Exercise, and Lifestyle studies were supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (contracts HHSN275201200007C, HHSN275201500001C, HHSN275201300026I/HHSN27500008, and HHSN275201300026I/HHSN27500018). There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00467363 (secondary analysis).

Indexed as

AdiposityLive BirthObesityReproductive Techniques, AssistedAdiponectinAdultBiomarkersBody Mass IndexFemaleFertilizationHumansLeptinPregnancyPregnancy RateAdiponectinBiomarkersLeptinadipositybody compositionbody mass indexinfertility outcomesobesity

Identifiers

PMID40605077
PMCPMC12756995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.