ArticleBMC research notes2025
Clinical reasoning education: evaluating the effect of script strategy and reflective practice on nursing students' reasoning development.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe script strategy is a multistage, adaptive method designed for integration with established clinical reasoning frameworks to enhance educational outcomes for clinical students. This study evaluated the effect of these pedagogical interventions on nursing students' learning, satisfaction levels, and learning experience. This quasi-experimental study was conducted at Tehran University of Medical Science, involving nursing students enrolled in the clerkship course (n = 58). The intervention group was trained using the script strategy method combined with structured reflection within a workplace-based education setting. A hypothesis formation test and a 10-item questionnaire were used to evaluate the students' clinical reasoning skills. In addition, the experiences of the nursing students were explored through conventional content analysis.
resultsThe students' scores in reasoning skills were 18.54 ± 11.33 (out of 20), which was significantly above the cutoff value of 10.8. The students' satisfaction score was 74.37 ± 16.31 on a 100-point scale. The students' experiences were explored under the theme "a learner as a director in the learning process." The integration of script strategy enhances the reasoning abilities of nursing students. This approach fosters a sense of responsibility for their learning and cultivates critical thinking skills essential for professional nurses in dynamic healthcare environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.