Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40605072›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2025

Clinical reasoning education: evaluating the effect of script strategy and reflective practice on nursing students' reasoning development.

Fatemeh Bahramnezhad, Fatemeh Keshmiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fatemeh BahramnezhadDepartment of ICU, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh KeshmiriMedical Education Department, Education Development Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran. drkeshmiri1400@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe script strategy is a multistage, adaptive method designed for integration with established clinical reasoning frameworks to enhance educational outcomes for clinical students. This study evaluated the effect of these pedagogical interventions on nursing students' learning, satisfaction levels, and learning experience. This quasi-experimental study was conducted at Tehran University of Medical Science, involving nursing students enrolled in the clerkship course (n = 58). The intervention group was trained using the script strategy method combined with structured reflection within a workplace-based education setting. A hypothesis formation test and a 10-item questionnaire were used to evaluate the students' clinical reasoning skills. In addition, the experiences of the nursing students were explored through conventional content analysis.

resultsThe students' scores in reasoning skills were 18.54 ± 11.33 (out of 20), which was significantly above the cutoff value of 10.8. The students' satisfaction score was 74.37 ± 16.31 on a 100-point scale. The students' experiences were explored under the theme "a learner as a director in the learning process." The integration of script strategy enhances the reasoning abilities of nursing students. This approach fosters a sense of responsibility for their learning and cultivates critical thinking skills essential for professional nurses in dynamic healthcare environments.

Indexed as

Clinical ClerkshipClinical CompetenceClinical ReasoningEducation, Nursing, BaccalaureateStudents, NursingThinkingAdultCognitive ReflectionFemaleHumansIranLearningMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultClinical reasoningEducationHypothesis formationIntensive care unitLearningNursing studentReactionReflectionScript strategy

Identifiers

PMID40605072
PMCPMC12224862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.