Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40605069›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025

Investigating the effect of the digital storytelling of peers' childbirth experiences on the perception and mode of childbirth: a quasi-experimental study.

Zahra Mahdavi, Leila Amiri-Farahani, Sally Pezaro, Hamid Salehiniya, Soghra Omrani Saravi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zahra MahdaviDepartment of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Leila Amiri-FarahaniDepartment of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1996713883, Iran. l.amirifarahani@gmail.com.
Sally PezaroThe Research Centre for Healthcare and Communities, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Hamid SalehiniyaSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Soghra Omrani SaraviDepartment of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimTelling stories about giving birth vaginally can generate deeper understandings, potentially resulting in fewer requests to birth via cesarean section without medical reason. We aimed to determine the impact of the digital storytelling of peers' childbirth experiences on the perception and mode of childbirth in those birthing for the first time.

methodsThis quasi-experimental study invited those pregnant and birthing for the first time from four comprehensive health centers to participate. Using a simple randomizing method, two centers were assigned to the control group and two centers were assigned to the intervention group. Convenience sampling was used to recruit 65 eligible participants from each center group. The six steps of the ASPIRE model were used to guide the development of the intervention. Five story-telling videos were sent weekly to participants in the intervention group to watch between the 32nd and 36th weeks of pregnancy. After giving birth, data were collected via telephone from those in both the control and intervention groups in relation to their mode of childbirth as a primary outcome. Furthermore, 7 to 21 days after giving birth, all participants completed the Childbirth Perception Scale as a primary outcome.

resultsOur subgroup analysis confirmed a statistically significant difference between both the intervention and control groups (P = 0.001), whereby those who gave birth vaginally in the intervention group indicated more positive perceptions of childbirth. Contrariwise, no significant difference was identified between the intervention and control groups in terms of perception of childbirth score in participants who gave birth via emergency cesarean section (P = 0.45). In all included participants, that is, those who experienced vaginal childbirth and those who experienced emergency cesarean section, there was no significant difference identified between the intervention and control groups in terms of perception of childbirth score (P = 0.088).

conclusionThe digital storytelling of peers' childbirth experiences is effective in cultivating more positive perceptions in relation to the experience of childbirth, specifically among those who experience childbirth vaginally. Considering the above, digital storytelling may be implemented as a useful tool in childbirth preparation, though the need for alternative interventions remains in pursuit of lowering the number of unnecessary births via cesarean section conducted overall.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricNarrationParturitionPeer GroupAdultCesarean SectionFemaleHumansPerceptionPregnancyYoung AdultChildbirth experienceDigitalMode of childbirthPeersPerception of childbirthStorytelling

Identifiers

PMID40605069
PMCPMC12220519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.