ArticleBMC psychology2025
What has a greater influence on adolescent mental health: BMI or self-efficacy? Evidence from a Peruvian sample.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMental health in adolescents is a public health issue with both immediate and long-term implications. Several studies have demonstrated that Body Mass Index (BMI) and self-efficacy are associated with this issue, although they have generally been examined independently. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the predictive role of BMI and self-efficacy in mental health in a sample of Peruvian adolescents.
methodThe research was non-experimental and predictive in nature. The sample consisted of 343 students (49.6% male and 50.4% female), aged 12 to 17 years (M = 14.71; SD = 1.08), from a public educational institution in Metropolitan Lima, Peru. The sample was selected through non-probabilistic, purposive sampling. The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) and the Mental Health Inventory (R-MHI-5) were used, and BMI was measured using Quetelet’s formula.
resultsThe results showed a significant relationship between BMI and mental health, as well as between self-efficacy and mental health (p < 0.001). Additionally, no statistically significant differences were found between BMI, self-efficacy, and mental health according to gender and age (p > 0.05). Moreover, multiple regression analysis revealed that the predictor variables BMI and self-efficacy explained 25.1% (adjusted R2) of the variability in adolescent mental health. The standardized coefficients (β) indicated that self-efficacy (0.452) had a greater impact on the prediction of mental health than BMI (-0.202).
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that self-efficacy, understood as adolescents’ personal beliefs about their ability to control their lives and solve problems, has a more significant impact on their mental health than their body mass index (BMI). Therefore, it is recommended that educational and public health interventions aimed at improving mental health adopt a holistic approach that integrates both physical and nutritional components (BMI) as well as psychological components (self-efficacy).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.