ArticleBMC oral health2025
The impact of using two fiber-reinforced composites with different placement methods on the flexural strength of two resin materials: an in vitro study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis in vitro study assessed the influence of using two types of fiber-reinforced composite with different placement methods on the flexural strength of two resin materials.
methodsSpecimens were fabricated using two FRC products (QUARTZ SPLINT
resultsIn comparison to the control group, experimental groups utilizing BEAUTIFIL II (BT II) and BEAUTIFIL Flow Plus (BF+) with FRCs showed higher flexural strength (116.80 ± 11.45 MPa/107.02 ± 13.68 MPa and 302.06 ± 89.00 MPa/358.16 ± 96.10 MPa, respectively) (p < 0.05). Three-way ANOVA revealed that the flexural strength values were significantly affected by different resin composites, placing methods and fiber orientation respectively (p < 0.001).
conclusionsFRCs can be used as a reinforcing material for resin composites in a simulation of direct restoration. In some situations, the use of FRCs avoided complete fracture. The placement of FRCs and the composite used could be considered when applied clinically. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.