ArticleBMC health services research2025
Acceptance and perceived usefulness of digital health services in the management of chronic urticaria: a survey of patients and physicians.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital health applications, telemedicine and large language models in dermatology: results of a Germany-wide survey.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026Article
- Perspectives of Rehabilitation Specialists on Telerehabilitation in Jordan: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Implementation Barriers.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Wearable and Connected Technology for Allergy: Real-Time Monitoring and Predictive Management for Personalized Care.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic urticaria (CU) is a complex and unpredictable skin condition that significantly affects patients’ quality of life. As the healthcare landscape increasingly integrates digital health technologies, understanding their perceived usefulness in CU management from both patient and physician perspectives is crucial.
objectiveThis study investigates the acceptance, perceived usefulness, and potential barriers to using digital health services, such as medical apps and video consultations, among patients with CU and their healthcare providers.
methodsA quantitative survey was conducted across multiple specialized centers, specialist clinics, and general practices, involving both patients and physicians. The study utilized standardized questionnaires to assess digital health literacy, technology readiness, and attitudes toward adopting digital health services in CU management. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including Fisher’s exact test, were employed to analyze the data.
resultsA substantial proportion of the 121 surveyed patients and 101 physicians perceived digital health technologies as beneficial in managing CU, with 59.5% of patients and 75.3% of physicians agreeing on their advantages. However, 21.5% of patients and 14.9% of physicians remained neutral, while 8.3% of patients and 4.0% of physicians found these technologies unhelpful. Key barriers to adoption were identified, including concerns over data privacy, limitations in technical infrastructure, and a lack of awareness of available digital health solutions.
conclusionWhile many patients and physicians recognize the potential of digital health technology to improve urticaria management, some remain uncertain or skeptical. Addressing concerns and improving digital understanding is critical to the future implementation and integration of these technologies into care. Due to the cross-sectional design of the study and the self-reported data, further research may be needed to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.