ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025
The effect of intrapulmonary percussive ventilation on clinical parameters and the deposition of inhalation products in patients with stable COPD.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adjunctive Short-Wave Diathermy to High-Frequency Chest Wall Oscillation for Acute Exacerbation of COPD: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Canadian respiratory journal · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV) has demonstrated efficacy in acute settings for treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. Its routine use as an airway clearance technique in stable COPD patients lacks strong scientific support. PURPOSE: This study assessed the impact of 4 weeks of IPV treatment in nonhospitalized patients with stable COPD by clinical endpoints, parameters obtained by quantified CT-thorax and a deposition study of inhaled compounds.
methodsIn this prospective study, ten stable patients with severe to very severe COPD were recruited. Each patient received IPV treatment three times a week for four weeks in addition to their existing treatment. The baseline and posttreatment assessments included a chest CT scan, lung function tests, the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), and a 6-minute walking distance (6MWD). Dyspnea was scored using the Borg scale. The CT endpoints included mucus plug count and volume, lobe volume, airway volume, proportion of pulmonary blood in small pulmonary vessels (BV5%), and deposition of inhaled triple therapy (beclomethasone, formoterol, glycopyrronium) and a short-acting bèta2 mimetica (SABA) (salbutamol). The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to determine significant differences. To take into account regional differences, an additional mixed model analysis at the lobar level was performed.
resultsIn total, 9 patients (5 M/4 F) completed the study. The 6MWD increased from 329 m to 379 m (p = 0.008). The patient-reported outcomes, measured by the CCQ, tended to improve. The mucus plugs volume and count declined in patients with high baseline values. A decrease in lobe volume at the lobar level, measured at the TLC (p = 0.003), and an increase in lobe volume at the lobar level, measured at the FRC (p = 0.003), were observed. At the lobar level, BV5% decreased (p = 0.044). The distal deposition of triple therapy and SABA medication increased by 11% and 9%, respectively.
conclusionIPV for 4 weeks in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had a positive effect on exercise capacity and patient-reported outcomes. This effect is likely due to decreased hyperinflation, recruitment of small airways, mucus clearance, ameliorated gas exchange and increased distal deposition of inhaled therapy. IPV is a promising treatment for patients with severe to very severe COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.