ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2025
What are the effects of dry cupping therapy combined with the McKenzie method on clinical outcomes in chronic low back pain? A protocol for a randomized, sham-controlled trial.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05459376 (Effect of Dry Cupping Therapy Associated With the McKenzie Method in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Dry Cupping Therapy Associated With the McKenzie Method in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: Protocol for a Sham-controlled Randomized Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Visual analysis of research hotspots and trends of external therapies in traditional Chinese medicine for chronic pain.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough exercise is a first-line approach to treating chronic low back pain (CLBP) in clinical practice, passive techniques such as dry cupping therapy are considered complementary to this condition. However, knowledge about the effects of combining dry cupping therapy with active exercises in people with non-specific CLBP is shallow.
objectiveTo evaluate the effects of dry cupping therapy with the McKenzie method (MDT) on disability and functional outcomes in people with non-specific CLBP.
methodsEighty-eight people with non-specific CLBP aging 18 to 59 years will be recruited and evaluated for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants will be randomized into intervention (MDT and dry cupping therapy) or sham group (MDT and sham dry cupping therapy). Dry cupping therapy will be applied bilaterally to the vertebrae (L1 to L5). Interventions will be performed twice a week for eight weeks, and participants will be assessed before treatment (T0), immediately after the first intervention (T1), and at four (T4) and eight weeks of intervention (T8). Primary outcomes will be disability (Oswestry Disability Index). Secondary outcomes will be functionality (Timed Up and Go Test), pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), trunk range of motion (Toe-touch Test) and participant expectation and perception (Global Perceived Effect Scale). DISCUSSION: Despite recent research, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the effectiveness of dry cupping therapy in the treatment of people with non-specific CLBP. Also, no study with high methodological rigor has evaluated the combination of dry cupping therapy with active exercise in this population and whether this combination potentiates any clinical effect. Thus, this protocol may guide further research to support the prescription of exercise combined with dry cupping therapy in people with non-specific CLBP. The results of the study will be disseminated to participants through social networks and will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ClinicalTrials.gov, October, 2023 (report number: NCT05459376).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.