ArticleBMC public health2025
The effect of an educational program on knowledge about sexual abuse prevention among child laborers: a quasi-experimental study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChild laborers are a vulnerable group at heightened risk for sexual abuse. However, their specific needs are often overlooked in traditional educational programs, primarily due to socio-economic barriers and school non-attendance, which prevent these children from accessing the necessary resources and information to protect themselves from social risks, such as sexual abuse. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention designed to enhance knowledge about sexual abuse prevention among child laborers.
methodsThis quasi-experimental study was conducted on child laborers at two support centers in Tehran, Iran. Participants were non-randomly assigned to either the intervention (n = 30) or control (n = 30) group based on their respective support centers. The intervention group received a four-session educational program covering topics such as recognizing inappropriate behaviors, identifying potential abusers, and learning how to protect themselves and seek help. The control group received no intervention. Data were collected using a demographic form and a self-developed Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Knowledge Questionnaire. The questionnaire's content and face validity were confirmed and its internal consistency was supported by a Cronbach's alpha of 0.89. Assessments were conducted at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and three months later. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 24, employing independent t-tests, chi-square, and the repeated measures ANOVA. A significance level of P < 0.05 was considered.
resultsPrior to the intervention, there were no significant differences in knowledge between the intervention and control groups (P = 0.30). Repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of time (P < 0.001), indicating that knowledge scores changed significantly across the time points. A significant main effect of group was observed (P = 0.002), with the intervention group consistently showing higher knowledge scores. Additionally, the interaction effect between time and group was significant (P < 0.001), indicating that the knowledge change over time differed significantly between the two groups.
conclusionThe educational program significantly enhanced knowledge about sexual abuse prevention among child laborers, with sustained improvements observed at the three-month follow-up. This intervention provides a promising model for empowering vulnerable children with the knowledge needed to protect themselves. Future research should explore the program's long-term outcomes, its impact on behavioral change, and assess its potential for integration into child protection policies and broader educational frameworks. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.