Trial reportBMC public health2025
The impact of the Change4Life Food Scanner app on children's diets and parental psychological outcomes: a randomised pilot and feasibility study.
Trial report in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Change4Life Food Scanner app raises awareness of the nutritional content of barcode-scanned packaged food through a variety of visual displays. This study investigated (1) the feasibility and acceptability of evaluating the effectiveness of the Food Scanner app in reducing children's energy (kcal) and sugar (g) intake over a 3-month period, (2) app engagement and (3) the app's impact on psychological outcomes.
methodsAdopting a non-blinded parallel trial design, 126 parents of 4-11 year olds were randomly assigned (1:1) through block randomisation sequences into a 3-month intervention consisting of exposure to the Food Scanner app (version 1.6; [n = 62]) or no intervention (n = 64). Intervention participants were encouraged to use the app for healthier food choices when shopping. Participants completed baseline and 3-month follow-up (3MFU) measures of child dietary intake, psychological, and health economic outcomes. Dietary intake was also assessed at 1-month. The intervention arm additionally completed fortnightly app engagement measures and all participants provided feasibility feedback at 3MFU. Mixed model Analysis of Variance and independent t-tests of mean differences assessed changes in dietary intake. Descriptive analyses were conducted for all other measures. Ethical approval was obtained by the University of Sheffield Research Ethics Committee (026380).
resultsThe study was completed by 64 (51%) of 126 participants (29 [45%] in the intervention group and 35 [55%] in the control group). Most participants (> 80%) found the study acceptable, whilst 68% of intervention participants would recommend the app to others. There was a mean difference in daily energy (kcal) intake of 18 (95% CI: -180; 217) at 3MFU, and a mean difference of 10g in sugar intake (95% CI: -3; 23), between conditions, with a greater reduction within the control condition. Average app engagement declined over the study, from 14.1 min (± 14.7) in week 2 to 6.8 min (± 11.6) in week 12. Minor differences in psychological outcomes were observed between conditions.
conclusionsDespite high attrition, study procedures were deemed feasible. Low app engagement and usage barriers may have impacted app acceptability and related outcomes. Recommendations are provided for future app development and full-scale trial design.
trial registrationISRCTN12169303; 12
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.