ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Noninvasive prediction of fetal growth restriction using maternal plasma cell-free RNA: a case-control study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated bioinformatics and machine learning to explore the common mechanisms and potential biomarkers between periodontitis and preterm birth.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFetal growth restriction (FGR) is a significant concern due to its potential adverse outcomes for both mothers and infants. Cell-free RNA in maternal plasma has been suggested as a potential biomarker for pregnancy complications, but its effectiveness in predicting FGR remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the predictive value of cell-free RNA profiling from maternal plasma collected during early to mid-pregnancy for FGR.
methodsThis case-control study included pregnant women diagnosed with FGR who had non-invasive prenatal test data. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between FGR and controls groups were identified through the analysis of cell-free RNA and placental microarray dataset which downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. The intersection of DEGs from cell-free RNA and placenta was explored to explore hub genes. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used to select the hub genes from the cell-free RNA DEGs. The prediction model was then constructed using logistic regression with hub genes and clinical characteristics. The predictive accuracy of model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.
resultsA total of 39 FGR samples and 133 control samples were included in this study. Among them, 405 cell-free RNA DEGs were identified. BIN2 was identified as the intersecting gene that was up-regulated in both cell-free RNA and FGR placental transcripts. Subsequently, RHOA and OAZ1 were selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. The hub genes, including BIN2, RHOA and OAZ1, exhibited positive correlations with each other and were up-regulated in the FGR group. A logistic regression model incorporating the hub genes and clinical characteristics was constructed, achieving the highest classification performance with area under the curve of 0.812 (95% CI: 0.719-0.904) in the training cohort, 0.863 (95% CI: 0.736-0.989) in the validation cohort, and 0.786 (95% CI: 0.513-1.000) in the time test cohort. The calibration curve indicated good calibration of the model, and the decision curve analysis demonstrated practical value in clinical application.
conclusionsAn effective prediction model for FGR was developed by integrating maternal plasma cell-free RNA with clinical characteristics, enabling early evaluation of FGR risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.