Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40604622›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding anthrax among affected communities, Kazo district, South-Western uganda, May 2022.

Shaban Senyange, Edirisa J Nsubuga, Benon Kwesiga, Lilian Bulage, Alex R Ario

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shaban SenyangeUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, and Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda. ssenyange@musph.ac.ug.
Edirisa J NsubugaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, and Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7433-4829
Benon KwesigaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, and Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Lilian BulageUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, and Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Alex R ArioUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, and Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnthrax is a priority zoonotic disease in Uganda. Despite health education about risks of eating meat from animals found dead, some areas including Kazo District, experience repeated anthrax outbreaks associated with this practice. We assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) around anthrax and consumption of meat of animals found dead in previously-affected communities in Kazo District.

methodsA mixed-methods study was conducted in six villages in Kazo District from May 23-June 4, 2022. Structured questionnaires were administered to 200 systematically-sampled community respondents aged ≥ 18 years about anthrax-related KAP and experiences with livestock loss. Focus group discussions were conducted with community members identified as anthrax case-patients in previous outbreaks and those whose animals died suddenly in the previous year. Overall knowledge was assessed through a set of eight questions on anthrax; species affected, signs and symptoms, transmission and prevention in humans and animals. Participants' responses were scored to KAP questions as 1 = correct or 0 = incorrect; adequate knowledge score was ≥ 4. One sample binomial test was used to find the difference in proportions. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsAmong 200 survey respondents, 65% were female; mean age was 45 (SD ± 17.7) years. In total, 94% (p < 0.0001) had heard of anthrax, 65.5% (p < 0.0001) knew it was zoonotic; 74.5% (p < 0.0001) did not know any signs of anthrax in animals, though 78.5% (p < 0.0001) knew transmission could occur through eating animals found dead. Only 16% said they had lost their livestock suddenly in the last year; of these, 21% consumed the meat and 53% buried the carcasses. Overall, 77% (p < 0.0001) had adequate knowledge about anthrax. Qualitative data indicated that farmers did not vaccinate their animals against anthrax due to cost, and inadequate access to vaccine and veterinary services. Poverty, limited access to meat protein and economic challenges were cited as drivers for consuming meat from animals found dead despite the risk.

conclusionGood knowledge about anthrax among residents of a repeatedly-affected community may not have translated to safe practices. Compensating farmers for anthrax-positive carcasses in exchange for permitting safe animal disposal might reduce risk of transmission.

Indexed as

AnthraxHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsDisease OutbreaksFemaleFocus GroupsHumansLivestockMaleMeatMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUgandaAnthraxKazo districtKnowledge-attitude-practiceUgandaZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID40604622
PMCPMC12220345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.