Trial reportBMC oral health2025
Effects of types of toothpastes (whitening versus regular) and brands of silicone aesthetic ligatures on discoloration of elastomeric ligatures applied to mandibular central and lateral incisors: a hierarchical, single-blind, 6-arm, split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveBoth orthodontists and patients frequently express concerns about the discolorations of elastomeric ligatures. It is important to know which toothpastes or brands or other factors can severely discolor elastic ligatures. Despite the clinical importance of this matter, the literature in this regard is very scarce (only 3 studies) with contradicting results. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of whitening and regular toothpastes on the color stability of clear elastomeric ligatures from different brands, applied to different incisors.
methodsIn this hierarchical 6-arm split-mouth double-blind randomized clinical trial, 264 ligatures were applied to orthodontic brackets bonded to bilateral mandibular central and lateral incisors in 66 patients: The sample was randomized twice: Once it was randomly divided into three groups of toothpastes (n = 66 patients): Regular Crest, Advance White Arm & Hammer Whitening, and Extra Whitening Crest. The next phase was split-mouth: In each patient, one side of the mouth was randomly assigned to Ortho Organizer brand while the other side was assigned to Ortho Technology ligatures. In the baseline, the ligatures were evaluated using the CIE L*a*b color system. After four weeks, the ligatures were re-evaluated using the CIE L*a*b* color system. The extents of changes in color parameters L, A, B, and E were analyzed using 3-way repeated-measures ANOVA. Other statistical analyses were also conducted using repeated-measures ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficient, and independent-samples t-test (α = 0.05).
resultsThe overall color stability of elastic ligatures was not influenced by the toothpastes in use (P = 0.649 for ∆E, P values ranging between 0.669 and 0.989 for other parameters) or the type of incisor on which the ligature was mounted (P = 0.656 for ∆E, P values ranging between 0.006 and 0.647 for other parameters). The discolorations of elastic ligatures were significantly different between the two ligature brands (P = 0.000 for ∆E, P values = 0.000 for other parameters). Ortho Organizer showed a higher color stability than Ortho Technology. Both ligature brands showed a level of discoloration deemed clinically unacceptable (E > 3.3), regardless of the toothpaste used. Discolorations were mostly due to severe changes in ∆B parameter (yellowness) compared to ∆L or ∆A (P = 0.000).
conclusionAlthough the type of toothpaste has no significant impact on the color stability of elastomeric ligatures, the brand of ligatures individually plays a significant role in this regard.
trial registrationThe study was prospectively registered with the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials on March 28, 2022 (IRCT Code: IRCT20220315054292N1) before beginning the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.