Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40604594›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Validation of the arabic version of the edinburgh postnatal depression scale for screening antenatal depression in Oman.

Khalood Al-Abri, Hana Al Sumri, Mohammed Al-Azri, Divya Kuzhivilayil Yesodharan, Rahma Al Kindi

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Khalood Al-AbriDepartment of Community and Mental Health, College of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman. khulood2014@squ.edu.om.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3313-377X
Hana Al SumriDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University Muscat, Muscat, Oman.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9147-6164
Mohammed Al-AzriDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University Muscat, Muscat, Oman.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6136-4081
Divya Kuzhivilayil YesodharanDepartment of Community and Mental Health, College of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0801-2682
Rahma Al KindiUniversity Medical City Oman, Muscat, Oman.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3686-8624

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntenatal depression is a common mental health problem that women experience during their pregnancies. If left untreated, it can increase a woman's risk of developing postnatal depression and have adverse effects on both mothers and children. Therefore, early identification of depression requires a valid screening tool. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is still the most widely recognised screening instrument used to identify symptoms of postnatal depression. Despite the existence of a general Arabic version, it may not accurately reflect the unique cultural characteristics and healthcare practices of Oman. Therefore, the validity of the EPDS for antenatal depression remains uncertain, as no studies have yet addressed its validation in this population.

aimsTo establish the validity of the Omani Arabic version of EPDS with an optimal cut-off value as a screening instrument to identify symptoms of depression among women attending antenatal care.

methodsA thoroughly translated and modified Arabic Omani version of the EPDS was designed and validated, with the Arabic PHQ-9 being used as the gold standard. Self-questionnaires were distributed to a sample of 352 women receiving antenatal care at University Medical City Oman and five primary healthcare centres in Muscat governorate, the capital city of Oman. Receiver Operator Characteristic curve was plotted, the area under the curve was calculated, and the optimal cut-off value was identified using Youden's index.

resultsThe Omani version validation of the EPDS yielded an optimal cut-off score of 11/12 for antenatal depression, with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 86.30%, 71.37%, 45.65%, and 94.92%, and an area under the curve of 0.85. Youden's index reached a maximum at 0.58 with a cut-off point of 11. The optimal cut-off value is 10 in the first trimester (Youden's index 0.63) with sensitivity of 100.00% and specificity of 63.16%, 11 in the second trimester (Youden's index 0.56) with sensitivity of 86.21% and specificity of 69.90%, and 12 in the third trimester (Youden's index 0.60) with sensitivity of 78.57% and specificity of 80.99%. The internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha was 0.70, indicating acceptable reliability.

conclusionThe study's findings indicate that the Omani version of the EPDS as a valid instrument to screen symptoms of antenatal depression among Omani women.

Indexed as

DepressionDepression, PostpartumMass ScreeningPregnancy ComplicationsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAdultFemaleHumansOmanPregnancyPrenatal CareReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAntenatal depressionArabic Version of the EPDSOmanValidation

Identifiers

PMID40604594
PMCPMC12220313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.