ArticleBMC public health2025
Development of an electronic health record-based Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) risk prediction model for women, incorporating social determinants of health.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identify Patients at Risk of HIV Using a Clinical Large Language Model from Electronic Health Records.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- A turning point for youth HIV care in the United States: tailored strategies for adolescents and young adults.Critical public health · 2026Article
- Identify Patients at Risk of HIV Using a Clinical Large Language Model from Electronic Health Records.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHuman Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prevents HIV transmission but has low uptake among women. Identifying women who could benefit from PrEP remains a challenge. This study developed a women-specific model to predict HIV risk within a year using electronic health record (EHR) data and social determinants of health (SDoH).
methodsWe conducted a case-control study using EHR and claims data from a centralized patient repository in the Southeastern United States (OneFlorida+). The dataset was split into 60% training, 30% testing, and 10% calibration. Five-fold cross-validation was applied for hyperparameter tuning. Contextual-level SDoH were linked to EHR/claim data. Various machine learning (ML) methods were tested, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values were used to interpret the model.
resultsOur sample included 1,458 women newly diagnosed with HIV and 33,155 controls who had never been diagnosed. The XGBoost model outperformed other ML methods, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 89.3%. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 83% to 82% at the optimal Youden's index cutoff, identifying 20% as high risk, to 42% and 97% at the optimal F1 score cutoff, identifying 5% as high risk. Of the 20 features with the highest SHAP values, 11 were related to SDoH.
conclusionThe final model, incorporating demographics, clinical features, and SDoH, can predict HIV risk in the next year for women. Several SDoH factors were found to be important predictors. Future work could involve stakeholders in implementing the model into HIV PrEP decision support and exploring causal pathways to guide risk-reduction interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.