Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40604591›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2025

Elder abuse without borders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tegene Atamenta Kitaw, Amsalu Baylie, Bruktawite Afework Tekle, Befkad Derese Tilahun, Addisu Getie, Biruk Beletew Abate, Sefineh Fenta Feleke, Alemu Birara Zemariam, Molla Azmeraw, Gizachew Yilak and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tegene Atamenta KitawDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia. tegene.a@wldu.edu.et.
Amsalu BaylieDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Bruktawite Afework TekleMSI Ethiopia Reproductive Choices, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Befkad Derese TilahunDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Addisu GetieDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Biruk Beletew AbateDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Sefineh Fenta FelekeDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Alemu Birara ZemariamDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Molla AzmerawDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Gizachew YilakDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Seada SeidDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Ribka Nigatu HaileDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcross continents and cultures, elder abuse remains a silent crisis, hidden behind closed doors. Vulnerable older adults face neglect, exploitation, and harm, often from those they trust most. Despite its devastating impact, global awareness and intervention efforts remain inadequate. This study unveils the true scale of the issue, urging immediate action to protect the aging population.

methodsWe searched multiple databases, including Medline, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, International Scientific Indexing, Global Health, Global Index Medicus, Embase, and Google Scholar in December 2024, with an updated search in January 2025. We included observational studies published from 2000 to 2025. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. The effect size was pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was explored using Cochrane's Q statistic (chi-square) and inverse variance (I²). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the influence of individual studies on the overall pooled estimates. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg's and Egger's regression tests.

resultA total of 94 studies from 35 countries were included (n = 776,044). The pooled prevalence of elder abuse was 27.6% (95% CI: 23.5-31.6). By type, emotional/psychological abuse was most prevalent (20.9%, 95% CI: 14.8-26.9), followed by neglect (19.3%, 95% CI: 12.8-25.8), financial/material exploitation (11.7%, 95% CI: 8.5-14.9), verbal abuse (11.0%, 95% CI: 5.5-16.5), physical abuse (7.9%, 95% CI: 5.0-10.8), and sexual abuse (1.5%, 95% CI: 0.7-2.2). Upper-middle-income countries had the highest prevalence (37.0%, 95% CI: 28.0-46.0), with South America (42.0%, 95% CI: 14.0-71.0) and Asia (36.0%, 95% CI: 27.0-45.0) reporting the highest regional rates. Institutional settings showed higher prevalence (29.0%, 95% CI: 20.0-38.0) than community-based studies (27.0%, 95% CI: 23.0-32.0).

conclusionThis meta-analysis reveals that over one-quarter of older adults worldwide experience abuse, with emotional and psychological abuse being the most prevalent. Institutional settings and upper-middle-income countries report significantly higher abuse rates, highlighting the need for targeted interventions. Sexual abuse remains underreported, likely due to stigma, though its low prevalence may still indicate a hidden issue. Regional variations suggest cultural and socioeconomic factors significantly influence abuse patterns. These findings emphasize the urgent need for global screening tools, institutional staff training, community awareness programs, and policy reforms prioritizing elder protection.

Indexed as

Elder AbuseAgedGlobal HealthHumansPrevalenceElder abuseGlobal prevalenceMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40604591
PMCPMC12220308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.