ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Frail older people ageing in place alone and their perception of the built environment in rural and urban sites: a mixed-methods study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vulnerability and resilience in symbiotic interaction: a qualitative study on the lived experiences of rural older women in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhen older people have limited physical ability, several difficulties could arise from a built environment that is not appropriate for their needs, especially when they live alone without cohabiting with their relatives. The study explores how frail older people with functional limitations are ageing in place alone and how they perceive and manage the built environment, i.e., housing (home and building) and neighbourhood, with regard to both urban and rural sites.
methodsData were collected for the main IN-AGE "Inclusive Ageing in Place" study, which was carried out in 2019 in Italy. For this paper, semi-structured interviews involving 40 participants aged 65 years and over in the Marche Region (Central Italy) were processed, and a mixed-methods analysis (quantitative/qualitative) was conducted. Simple quantitative/descriptive elaborations (univariate and bivariate analyses) were integrated with thematic content analysis.
resultsThe findings suggested, among others, the following issues: high costs for managing the home, poor relationships with neighbours in some cases, scarcity of proximity services especially in rural sites, and the presence of architectural/mobility barriers, even though the latter are little perceived when inside the home. Moreover, the majority of seniors were emotionally attached to their living place, although feelings of loneliness and isolation emerged, also following depopulation in rural areas.
conclusionsDespite the small/not representative sample size, the results highlight how, a built environment that is perceived as inadequate, could hamper ageing in place and participating in communities for frail seniors. This could be managed with appropriate interventions to be implemented taking into account the diversity between rural and urban sites. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.