Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40604577›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2025

Assessing the performance of paediatric early warning scores to predict critical deterioration events in hospitalised children (the DETECT study): a retrospective matched case-control study.

Abbey Bracken, Steven Lane, Sarah Siner, Dawn Jones, Caroline Lambert, Fulya Mehta, Chin-Kien Eyton-Chong, Peter Davis, John Fitzsimons, Emma Lim and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Abbey BrackenDepartment of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. abbey.bracken@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5110-1376
Steven LaneHealth Data Science, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Sarah SinerClinical Research Division, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Dawn JonesClinical Research Division, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Caroline LambertDepartment of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Fulya MehtaDepartment of General Paediatrics, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Chin-Kien Eyton-ChongCritical Care Unit, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Peter DavisBristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0669-2485
John FitzsimonsChildren's Health Ireland at Temple Street, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9431-9749
Emma LimDepartment of General Paediatrics, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5403-3065
Linda ClerihewNinewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
Bernie CarterFaculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5226-9878
Gerri Sefton *Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Enitan D Carrol *Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8357-7726

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research II-LA-0216-20002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPaediatric Early Warning Scores (PEWS) enhance patient safety, by focused monitoring of vital signs to identify children at risk of deteriorating. However, there is an acknowledged need for standardisation. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of seven PEWS (Alder Hey, Bedside, Bristol, Irish, Newcastle, Scottish and the proposed National PEWS for England (v3)) utilised in clinical practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland. The primary outcome was occurrence of a critical deterioration event (CDE) in hospitalised children, and secondary outcome was 72-hour hospital mortality.

methods250 patient episodes were identified over a 12-month period. Cases were matched 2:1 with controls; using age range and admitting specialty. PEWS were calculated, along with performance characteristics. Maximum PEWS were calculated at 24, 12, 6 and 4 h prior to CDE or discharge, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) used to measure performance. Sub-group analysis explored performance within 3 specialities observed to have increased risk for deterioration. Kaplan-Meier survival curves compared time to event data using the identified optimum PEWS performance cut-point.

resultsThe median age of patients experiencing CDE was 8 months. AUCs across all PEWS in predicting CDE, ranged from 0·87 to 0·95. Optimum cut-offs for each PEWS were identified. Kaplan-Meier curves for cumulative risk of time to CDE according to the PEWS stratification, demonstrated CDE was significantly less likely for patients below the cut-off values (log-rank test, p < 0·001).

conclusionsAll seven PEWS assessed demonstrate excellent predictive ability for CDE, in a heterogenous cohort. For evaluation of PEWS performance, CDE is a more appropriate outcome measure than hospital mortality, due to low mortality outside PICU. A standardised PEWS allows consistency, benchmarking and opportunity for continuing recalibration.

Indexed as

Clinical DeteriorationCritical IllnessEarly Warning ScoreAdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansInfantKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleRetrospective StudiesROC CurveAdmissionCritical careCritical deterioration eventsPaediatric early warning scorePEWS

Identifiers

PMID40604577
PMCPMC12220617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.