ArticleBMC neurology2025
Optimal timing for tracheostomy in severe ischemic stroke patients: early or standard incision?
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTracheostomy is frequently performed in severe ischemic stroke patients, yet the ideal timing for this procedure remains undefined. This study seeks to inform clinical decisions by evaluating the impact of early versus standard tracheostomy on clinical outcomes in this patient population.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed severe ischemic stroke patients who underwent tracheostomy at our hospital between January 2013 and November 2023. Patients were categorized into early tracheostomy (ET) and standard tracheostomy (ST) groups based on the interval from intubation to tracheostomy. Clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. The logistic regression model was used to assess the correlation between the timing of tracheostomy and outcomes, and the Kaplan-Meier method was employed to analyze time-to-event results.
resultsThe study encompassed 110 patients, with 57 in the ET group and 53 in the ST group. The results showed that the ET group had a longer interval from onset to intubation (P = 0.048), but there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with severe disability after six months (OR 1.089 [95% CI 0.377-3.144], aOR 1.091 [95% CI 0.345-3.447]). The ET group demonstrated a shorter mechanical ventilation time (aOR 1.036 [95%CI 1.005-1.069]) and a decreased incidence of tracheostomy-related complications (aOR 5.378 [95%CI 1.065-27.144]).
conclusionEarly tracheostomy does not affect the long-term outcomes of patients with severe ischemic stroke, but it may offer potential benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.