ArticleBMC public health2025
Association of socio-economic environment and women's empowerment with daily fruit and vegetable intake in Latin American cities: a multilevel study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn Latin America, a low proportion of the population meets the recommended fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake. The region is highly urbanized, with significant socioeconomic inequalities. The objective of this study was to analyze the association of the socio-economic environment (GDP per capita, living conditions) and women's empowerment (WE) with daily F&V intake in adults from Latin American cities, and whether these associations vary by individual education.
methodsCross-sectional study using secondary data from the SALURBAL project (Urban Health in Latin America), which compiled data from health surveys, censuses, and other surveys from cities with ≥ 100,000 inhabitants in 11 Latin American countries. The sample included 91,977 adults from 234 cities in 8 countries with self-reported F&V intake data. The outcome was daily F&V intake, defined as consuming F&V 7 days a week. City-level exposures included GDP per capita (tertiles), living conditions score (overcrowding, piped water, and education access; Z-scores), and WE score (labor force participation and early marriage; Z-scores). We estimated prevalence ratios (PR) for the association between each exposure and daily F&V intake using gender-stratified two-level Poisson models with random intercepts for cities adjusted by city and individual-level covariates. Interaction terms were included to evaluate effect-modification by individual education.
resultsParticipants from cities in the upper GDP tertiles (T2 and T3) showed a ~ 7% higher prevalence of daily F&V intake among men (T2 PR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.00-1.15; T3 PR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.99-1.14) and women (T2 PR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.13; T3 PR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.99-1.12). A one standard deviation increase in WE and living conditions scores was associated with a ~ 10% higher prevalence of daily F&V intake in men (WE PR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02-1.19; living conditions PR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.04-1.16) and women (WE PR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.04-1.17; living conditions PR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05-1.15). Individual education levels significantly modified these associations (p < 0.05), which were stronger among those with lower educational attainment.
conclusionsCity GDP per capita, living conditions and WE were directly associated with fruit and vegetable daily intake, particularly among individuals with lower education levels in Latin America.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.