ArticleBMC public health2025
Social service organizations report improvements in social services-health care integration in survey during California's medicaid initiative ("CalAIM").
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging the Digital Divide with Digital Navigation in the California Safety Net: A Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo improve integration across health care and social needs, California's Medicaid transformation initiative, CalAIM, depends on partnerships between health care entities and social services organizations (SSOs). Given the potential for power imbalance both within the landscape of SSOs and between SSOs and healthcare entities, monitoring and elevating SSO perspectives during implementation is paramount.
methodsWe report the results of the SSO subgroup within a statewide survey conducted eighteen months into CalAIM implementation (July-September 2023, following CalAIM's January 2022 launch) among a diverse convenience sample of SSO respondents who were familiar with CalAIM. Results were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression models with CalAIM participation and six measures of perceived improvement as outcomes.
resultsThere were 355 SSO employee respondents representing 51 of 58 California counties, 66% of which worked in SSOs contracted as CalAIM providers. CalAIM participation was negatively associated with operating in a single county (OR 0.47, 95%CI 0.24-0.95), and positively associated with pilot participation (OR 6.4, 95% CI 2.5-16.4) and prior managed care contracting experience (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.7); pilot participation was negatively associated with fewer employees and non-profit status, indicating a possible mediation effect. Across all six models with outcomes of perceived improvement in health care-social services integration, CalAIM participation was strongly associated with increased odds of perceived improvement (OR 2.28 to 4.97), as was being frontline staff or a manager compared to senior leadership (Manager OR 1.76 to 2.85; frontline OR 1.92-3.35), and being a housing services provider (OR 1.80 to 2.15).
conclusionsOur analysis suggests that among SSOs familiar with CalAIM, smaller SSOs were less likely to be contracted CalAIM providers, possibly mediated by lower rates of prior Medicaid contracting experiences (e.g. pilot participation). Contracted SSOs perceived improvements in health care-social services integration at both the patient and organizational levels, suggesting CalAIM is functioning as intended in the perception of SSOs. We demonstrate a feasible method for ongoing monitoring of the SSO perspective that can inform near-term policy directions to ensure small SSOs with close community ties are fully included as partners in CalAIM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.