Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40604564›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2025

Evaluating a 52-week fresh food prescribing program in Ontario, Canada: A mixed-methods study on food insecurity, fruit and vegetable intake, and health.

Laura Jane Brubacher, Matthew Little, Ashmita Grewal, Eleah Stringer, Abby Richter, Warren Dodd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Food prescribing in Canada: evidence, critiques and opportunities.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2024
    Article
  3. Social prescribing in Canada: health promotion in action, 50 years after the Lalonde report.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura Jane Brubacher *School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada. ljbrubacher@uwaterloo.ca.
Matthew Little *School of Public Health and Social Policy, University of Victoria, HSD 202d, 3800 Finnerty Rd, Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2, Canada. matthewlittle@uvic.ca.
Ashmita GrewalSchool of Public Health and Social Policy, University of Victoria, HSD 202d, 3800 Finnerty Rd, Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2, Canada.
Eleah StringerSchool of Public Health and Social Policy, University of Victoria, HSD 202d, 3800 Finnerty Rd, Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2, Canada.
Abby RichterGuelph Community Health Centre, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Warren DoddSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada. wdodd@uwaterloo.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research Planning and Dissemination Grant 478709Michael Smith Health Research BC SCH-2021-1748Mitacs Accelerate Grant IT26188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood insecurity is linked with suboptimal diet and comprises an important risk factor for nutrition-related chronic diseases. Fresh food prescription programs are designed to improve access to healthy foods, but there is limited evidence on the impacts of such programs in the Canadian context. The objective of this mixed methods study was to assess changes in food security, fruit and vegetable intake, and health among adult participants of a fresh food prescribing program in Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

methodsA total of 57 adult participants who were experiencing food insecurity and had ≥ 1 cardio-metabolic condition or micronutrient deficiency received fresh food prescriptions from their healthcare practitioner, which included a nutrition and cooking information package and weekly vouchers ($10 per person in household) for an online produce market for 52 consecutive weeks. Pre-, mid-, and post-intervention surveys, blood pressure measurements, and clinical bloodwork were collected to assess food security, fruit and vegetable intake, self-reported health, and blood biomarkers of cardio-metabolic and nutritional health. We used a single-arm repeated-measures evaluation and paired t-tests and Fisher's exact tests to assess changes. Linear regression models were used to assess factors associated with change in fruit and vegetable intake. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants to expand on survey findings. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically using an inductive constant comparative approach.

resultsForty-nine participants completed post-intervention data collection. The proportion of participants experiencing severe food insecurity decreased after the intervention from 38.1% to 23.8%. Intake of fruit, orange vegetables, and 'other' vegetables increased during the intervention (p < 0.05). Mean triglyceride, fasting insulin, and ascorbic acid levels improved (p < 0.05). More severe food insecurity and lower fruit and vegetable intake at baseline, as well as more frequent interaction with healthcare providers, were associated with a greater increase in fruit and vegetable intake from pre- to post-intervention (p < 0.05). In interviews, participants reported that the program increased access to fresh fruits and vegetables, improved mental and physical health, provided social connections, and reduced financial stress.

conclusionsFresh food prescription programs may improve food security and increase fruit and vegetable intake, but further research is needed to determine their long-term health impacts.

Indexed as

DietFood InsecurityFood SupplyFruitVegetablesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioAccess to healthy foodsCommunity-based participatory researchCommunity health servicesDiet, food, and nutritionEatingFoodFood assistanceFood securityHealthy dietNutritional status

Identifiers

PMID40604564
PMCPMC12219258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.