ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
The relationship between sarcopenia, nutritional status, physical function, and quality of life in elderly cancer patients: a path analysis.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Computed tomography-defined sarcopenia is associated with nutritional vulnerability and short-term clinical burden in hospitalized patients with lymphoma.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Sex-specific associations between nutritional status, disease activity, and fatigue in psoriatic arthritis: a cross-sectional analysis.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study investigates the associations between sarcopenia and quality of life in elderly cancer patients, with nutritional status and physical function as potential mediators. It also explores the interactions among sarcopenia, nutritional status, and physical function.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 275 elderly cancer patients. Sarcopenia was assessed using the criteria of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2). Nutritional status was evaluated using the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) tool, along with serum albumin, prealbumin levels, and body mass index (BMI). Physical function was assessed using the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), gait speed, and Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. All functional indicators were standardized into z-scores. Quality of life (QOL) was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the relationships among sarcopenia, nutritional status, physical function, and QOL.
resultsMultivariate analysis indicated that sarcopenia, nutritional status, and physical function together explained 54% of the variance in quality of life. Path analysis showed significant associations through the following pathways: (1) Sarcopenia → Nutritional status → quality of life (22.0%); (2) Sarcopenia → Physical function → quality of life (17.07%); (3) Sarcopenia → Nutritional status → Physical function → quality of life (6.09%).
conclusionSarcopenia, nutritional status, and physical function are significantly associated with quality of life in elderly cancer patients. Physical function mediates the associations between both sarcopenia and nutritional status. Early detection and comprehensive interventions targeting sarcopenia, nutrition, and physical function are essential for improving patient outcomes. Future strategies should be individualized to address the complex needs of this population. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.