Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40604512›Full record

Trial reportBMC primary care2025

Effectiveness of digital platform in reducing unintentional medication discrepancies at transition of care from hospital discharge to primary healthcare settings: a randomised controlled trial.

Yen Yen Phang, Jew Win Kuan, Ai Ling Oh, Chuo Yew Ting, Nor Anizah Osman, Stephen Moses

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06517160 (A Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare MedBook Portal and Standard Care in Medication Reconciliation at Transitions of Care From Hospital Discharge to Primary Healthcare Settings), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06517160 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare MedBook Portal and Standard Care in Medication Reconciliation at Transitions of Care From Hospital Discharge to Primary Healthcare Settings

TypeinterventionalSponsorMinistry of Health, MalaysiaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled398ConditionsMedication ReconciliationArmsMedBook Portal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yen Yen PhangFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), Kota Samarahan, Malaysia. phangyenyen@gmail.com.
Jew Win KuanFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), Kota Samarahan, Malaysia.
Ai Ling OhPharmacy Department, Sarawak General Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kuching, Malaysia.
Chuo Yew TingPharmacy Service Division, Sarawak State Health Department, Ministry of Health, Kuching, Malaysia.
Nor Anizah OsmanPharmacy Service Division, Sarawak State Health Department, Ministry of Health, Kuching, Malaysia.
Stephen MosesPharmacy Service Division, Sarawak State Health Department, Ministry of Health, Kuching, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModifications to medication regimens during transitions of care between different healthcare settings often lead to unintentional medication discrepancies (UMDs). The MedBook Portal, a simple digital platform that enables the sharing of patient medication records among healthcare facilities under Ministry of Health, was developed to facilitate medication reconciliation at primary health clinic (PHC) after hospital discharge. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of MedBook Portal in reducing UMDs in the first prescription during the first PHC visit after hospital discharge.

methodsThis two-arm, parallel, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial was conducted at four public hospitals and ten public PHCs in Sarawak, Malaysia, from May 2023 to July 2024. Adult patients aged ≥ 18 years in general medical wards, discharged from hospitals, and referred to selected PHCs were recruited. In the Standard Care group, PHC doctors performed standard medication reconciliation by reviewing patients' medical records on their home-based medical cards and discharge notes, if available. In the MedBook Portal group, in addition to this process, PHC doctors logged into MedBook Portal to access the discharge prescription before issuing a new prescription.

resultsAmong the 339 eligible subjects randomised into MedBook Portal group and Standard Care group, 307 participants (147 MedBook Portal, 160 Standard Care) were analysed after excluding those for whom the intervention was not performed (n = 11) and those with no prescription (n = 21). The incidence rate of prescription with UMDs was significantly lower in the MedBook Portal group (5/147, 3.4%) compared to the Standard Care group (30/160, 18.8%) (p < 0.001). The most common UMD was drug omission (54.4%). Multivariable logistic regression showed that the presence of MedBook Portal reduced the odds of UMDs by 87% (adjusted OR 0.134, 95% CI 0.049-0.336, p < 0.001), whereas each additional comorbidity increased the odds by 52% (adjusted OR 1.520, 95% CI 1.158-2.020, p = 0.003).

conclusionsMedication reconciliation using the MedBook Portal effectively reduces UMDs during the transition of care from hospital discharge to PHCs, enhancing patient safety across the continuum of care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT06517160) was registered retrospectively on 19 September 2024.

Indexed as

Medication ErrorsMedication ReconciliationPatient DischargePrimary Health CareAdultAgedFemaleHumansMalaysiaMaleMiddle AgedDigital platformMedication reconciliationMedication safetyPrimary healthcareTransition of careUnintentional medication discrepancies

Identifiers

PMID40604512
PMCPMC12219133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.