ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
The relationship between grip strength, 6 minute walking distance and working memory in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: an fNIRS study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveFunctional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was employed to explore the potential relationship between grip strength, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), and working memory in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
methodsParticipants aged 60 years and above were recruited and assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Grip strength and 6MWD were measured, and fNIRS was utilized to monitor blood flow changes in the prefrontal lobe during an N-back task.
resultsA total of 72 participants were recruited, aged between 70 and 95 years, with MoCA scores ranging from 10 to 25 points. The MoCA score was most strongly correlated with 1-back performance (r = -0.423, p < 0.001), followed by 0-back performance, and showed no significant correlation with 2-back performance. The activation levels of several channels in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (ch17, ch19, ch23), right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (ch8), and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (ch2) were significantly higher in the high-performance group for 1-back compared to the low-performance group (p = 0.016, p = 0.008, p = 0.013; p = 0.018; p = 0.043). Grip strength and 6MWD were both significantly correlated with working memory performance under all three levels of cognitive load, with the strongest correlation observed for 1-back performance (grip strength: r = -0.377, p = 0.001; 6MWD: r = -0.382, p = 0.001). Grip strength was positively correlated with the activation levels of ch17 and ch19 (r = 0.234, p = 0.048; r = 0.249, p = 0.035), and significant inter-group differences were found for the activation level of ch19 (p = 0.032). Similarly, 6MWD was positively correlated with the activation levels of ch17 and ch2 (r = 0.312, p = 0.008; r = 0.256, p = 0.030), with significant inter-group differences observed in the activation levels of ch17, ch19, and ch2 (p = 0.007; p = 0.022; p = 0.029).
conclusionCognitive decline in older adults with MCI was associated with a decline in working memory, with 1-back performance being the most sensitive measure. The brain mechanisms underlying this sensitivity involved higher activation levels in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Older adults with stronger muscle strength and better cardiopulmonary function maintained better working memory, with higher activation levels in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. However, the specific activation channels were not entirely consistent across individuals. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.