ArticleNpj imaging2024
Rapid 3D imaging at cellular resolution for digital cytopathology with a multi-camera array scanner (MCAS).
Article in Npj imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Frame Temporal Integration for 3-D Shape Measurement of Freely Falling Small Objects Using a High-Speed Camera Array.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Foundation cell segmentation models performance on live microscopy and spatial-omics data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- High-throughput multi-camera array microscope platform for automated 3D behavioral analysis of swimming zebrafish larvae.Communications biology · 2026Article
- High-throughput multi-camera array microscope platform for automated 3D behavioral analysis of swimming zebrafish larvae.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Parallelized Brightfield and Fluorescence Imaging of Organoids Using a Scalable Multi-Camera Platform.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Recording dynamic facial micro-expressions with a multi-focus camera array.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical microscopy has long been the standard method for diagnosis in cytopathology. Whole slide scanners can image and digitize large sample areas automatically, but are slow, expensive and therefore not widely available. Clinical diagnosis of cytology specimens is especially challenging since these samples are both spread over large areas and thick, which requires 3D capture. Here, we introduce a new parallelized microscope for scanning thick specimens across extremely wide fields-of-view (54 × 72 mm
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.