ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel ultra-low temperature cascade refrigeration with dual auxiliary loop to enhance thermal performance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Exergy and Exergoeconomic Analyses and Optimization of a Three-Stage Cascade Refrigeration System Using Environmentally Friendly Refrigerants.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel kind of cascade refrigeration cycle for ultra-low temperature applications has been proposed in the present work to enhance thermal performance with reduced carbon footprints more economically. The conventional cascade refrigeration system (CCRS) has been modified, implementing a single auxiliary cycle (CRSAC) and dual auxiliary cycle (CRDAC) between HT and LT cycle and their performances are compared with CCRS and cascade refrigeration system with mechanical precooling (CRMP). The implementation of auxiliary cycles enables the modified cascade refrigerators to operate with lower compression ratio. The CRDAC cycle consumes 24-40% less energy than CCRS, 51-68% less than CRMP, and 23-38% less than CRSAC. Keeping the condenser temperature fixed at 318 K, varying the evaporative temperature from 193 to 220 K, the COP values of CRDAC, CRSAC, CRMP, and CCRS vary from 1.245 to 2.181, 0.89 to 1.41, 0.44 to 0.64, and 0.68 to 1.1 respectively. The CRDAC cycle provides approximately 40%, 62%, and 32% lower TEWI values and 13%, 25%, and 33% fewer E.I.I. values than CCRS, CRMP, and CRSAC cycles. Under the same operating conditions, the CRDAC cycle runs at 30-41% lower operational cost than CRSAC, 35-68%, and 37-60% lower than CRMP and CCRS, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.