Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40604168›Full record

Reviewnpj metabolic health and disease2025

Skeletal muscle proteomics: considerations and opportunities.

Julian P H Wong, Yaan-Kit Ng, Jeppe Kjærgaard, Ronnie Blazev, Atul S Deshmukh, Benjamin L Parker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in npj metabolic health and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julian P H WongDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Yaan-Kit NgDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jeppe KjærgaardNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ronnie BlazevDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Atul S DeshmukhNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Benjamin L ParkerDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. ben.parker@unimelb.edu.au.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP2009642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skeletal muscle accounts for 30-40% of body weight and plays an indispensable role in maintaining movement and is also a central regulator of whole-body metabolism. As such, understanding the molecular mechanisms of skeletal muscle health and disease is vital. Proteomics has been revolutionized in recent years and provided new insights into skeletal muscle. In this review, we first highlight important considerations unique to the field which make skeletal muscle one of the most challenging tissues to analyse by mass spectrometry. We then highlight recent advances using the latest case studies and how this has allowed coverage of the skeletal muscle temporal, fibre type and stem cells proteome. We also discuss how exercise and metabolic dysfunction can remodel the muscle proteome. Finally, we discuss the future directions of the field and how they can be best leveraged to increase understanding of human biology.

Identifiers

PMID40604168
PMCPMC12222842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.