ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of the readability level of the package inserts of topical antifungal drugs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fungi can cause infections in a number of body parts, including the skin, nails, hair and vulva-vaginal tissues. Topical antifungal drugs are the ones most frequently used to treat these infections. The purpose of this study is to assess topical antifungal medicine package insert readability using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) readability formulas. The package inserts of 97 topical antifungal medications from the drugs.com website was examined for this investigation. The SMOG and FKGL formulae were used to assess readability. The analysis determined that the Flesch Reading Ease Score was 60.76 ± 6.08, and the total average Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level for the entire prospectus was 7.59 ± 0.91. 11.45 ± 1.09 was the mean SMOG score. The package inserts for the miconazole group showed somewhat lower FKGL and higher Flesch Reading Ease ratings. This suggests that this group is more readable than the others. The majority of the prospectuses could be read by students in the seventh grade. Additionally, variations across various drug formulations were discovered. The most readable forms were cream and gel. Topical antifungal medication leaflets have a generally moderate literacy level, suitable for students in the seventh grade. To improve patient comprehension, some sections-especially those on possible adverse effects-might need to be further clarified. Making package inserts more readable could help improve patient outcomes by encouraging adherence to treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.