Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40604139›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2025

Penile length preservation in penile prosthesis placement: tips & tricks.

Pramod Krishnappa, Prasanna Matippa, Agustín Fraile-Poblador, Enrique Lledo-Garcia, Ignacio Moncada

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pramod KrishnappaDepartment of Urology and Robotic Surgery, NU Hospitals, Bangalore, India. Pramod23dr@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9614-9218
Prasanna MatippaDepartment of Urology and Robotic Surgery, NU Hospitals, Bangalore, India.
Agustín Fraile-PobladorDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales and ROC Clinic, Madrid, Spain.
Enrique Lledo-GarciaDepartment of Urology, Gregorio Maranon University General Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
Ignacio MoncadaDept of Urology and Robotic Surgery, La Zarzuela University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile Prosthesis (PP) is offered to patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) who prefer a definitive management, but subjective or objective penile length shortening after PP surgery is a concern. This review article aims to describe various preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative procedures and factors that may preserve or increase penile length during PP surgery. Preoperative strategies by the surgeon include vacuum erection devices (1 month), penile traction devices (2-4 months), and optimal surgical timing in priapism (early vs. delayed), and patient decisions include choosing a high-volume centre (>25 PP/year) and implant type (malleable vs. inflatable). The intraoperative manoeuvres included the subcoronal no-touch technique, cavernosal tissue-sparing dilatation, ventral phalloplasty, suspensory ligament release, suprapubic lipectomy, the sliding technique, the multiple-slit technique, and tunical expansion procedures. Simultaneous radical prostatectomy and PP surgery is gaining momentum to preserve the penile length in patients who have preexisting ED. Postoperative protocols included immediate postoperative inflation (60-80% inflated for 6 weeks), pump inflation protocol and the use of a vacuum device (without the ring, for 12 weeks). Using the above factors, the gain in penile length may range between 0.2 and 6.0 cm. The outcomes of these procedures are not universally reproducible at all centres.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.