Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40604136›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2025

Electrical stimulation of smiling muscles reduces visual processing load and enhances happiness perception in neutral faces.

J Baker, Hvv Ngo, T N Efthimiou, A Elsenaar, M Mehu, S Korb

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J BakerDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK. joshua.baker@essex.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8133-7622
Hvv NgoDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5828-5588
T N EfthimiouDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
A ElsenaarArtScience Interfaculty, Royal Academy of Art, Royal Conservatory, The Hague, The Netherlands.
M MehuDepartment of Psychology, Webster Vienna Private University, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5164-3573
S KorbDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK. sebastian.korb@essex.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3517-3783

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (Fonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung) P 32637-B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theories of embodied cognition suggest that after an initial visual processing stage, emotional faces elicit spontaneous facial mimicry and that the accompanying change in proprioceptive facial feedback contributes to facial emotion recognition. However, this temporal sequence has not yet been properly tested, given the lack of methods allowing to manipulate or interfere with facial muscle activity at specific time points. The current study (N = 52, 28 women) investigated this key question using EEG and facial neuromuscular electrical stimulation (fNMES)-a technique offering superior control over which facial muscles are activated and when. Participants categorised neutral, happy and sad avatar faces as either happy or sad and received fNMES (except in the control condition) to bilateral zygomaticus major muscles during early visual processing (-250 to +250 ms of face onset), or later visual processing, when mimicry typically arises (500-1000 ms after face onset). Both early and late fNMES resulted in a happiness bias specific to neutral faces, which was mediated by a reduced N170 in the early window. In contrast, a modulation of the beta-band (13-22 Hz) coherence between somatomotor and occipital cortices was found in the late fNMES, although this did not predict categorisation choice. We propose that facial feedback biases emotion recognition at different visual processing stages by reducing visual processing load.

Identifiers

PMID40604136
PMCPMC12222020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.