Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40604058›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A lightweight certificateless aggregate signature scheme without pairing for VANETs.

Qiuling Yue, Weijian Jiang, Hong Lei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qiuling YueSchool of Cyberspace Security(School of Cryptology), Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China.
Weijian JiangSchool of Cyberspace Security(School of Cryptology), Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China.
Hong LeiSchool of Cyberspace Security(School of Cryptology), Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China. leihong@hainanu.edu.cn.

Funding

in part by Hainan Province Science and Technology Special Fund No. GHYF2022010in part by the Research Startup Fund of Hainan University under Grant KYQD(ZR)-21071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the secure vehicular ad-hoc networks (VANETs), certificateless aggregate signature schemes(CLAS) have attracted more and more attention because they can efficiently implement message aggregation and authentication without complex certificate management. Recently, Zheng et al. proposed an efficient and privacy-protecting certificateless aggregate signature scheme, which is applicable to VANETs. However, through in-depth analysis, we found that it is vulnerable to temporary rogue key attacks. That is, an adversary can exploit the random numbers in signatures to generate an ephemeral rogue key, enabling him/her to forge an aggregate signature using both this rogue key and his/her private key. Furthermore, the forged signature can pass the verification without being detected. This paper fixes this vulnerability and proposes a security-enhanced CLAS scheme for VANETs. Specifically, our improved solution incorporates an additional aggregator's signature into the original framework and implements simultaneous verification of both the aggregator's signature and the aggregate signature to effectively resist rogue key attacks. In terms of security, we conducted a rigorous analysis of the security-enhanced CLAS scheme. In addition, through performance evaluation experiments, we compare the computational complexity and communication overhead of the security-enhanced CLAS scheme and some other schemes. The experimental results show that the security-enhanced CLAS scheme demonstrates significant advantages in both computational efficiency and communication cost while maintaining security. Our method can provide valuable references for the design of security solutions in related fields.

Indexed as

AuthenticationCertificateless Aggregate Signature (CLAS)Rogue-Key AttackVehicular Ad-Hoc Networks(VANETs)

Identifiers

PMID40604058
PMCPMC12223204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.