ArticleScientific reports2025
LSTM autoencoder based parallel architecture for deepfake audio detection with dynamic residual encoding and feature fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Compressed deepfake detection via GA-LASSO selection of deep features and machine learning models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid advancement of synthetic speech technologies, detecting deepfake audio has become essential for preventing impersonation and misinformation. This study aims to enhance detection performance by addressing limitations in existing models, such as temporal inconsistencies, weak contextual representation, and reconstruction loss. A novel framework, termed Long Short-Term Memory Auto-Encoder with Dynamic Residual Difference Encoding (LSTM-AE-DRDE), is proposed to overcome these challenges. The framework consists of two parallel modules: one leverages attention-enhanced LSTM with contrastive learning to highlight critical temporal cues, while the other amplifies real-vs-fake separability by computing residual differences across transformed audio variants. By integrating diverse speech features-including MFCC, temporal, prosodic, wavelet packet, and glottal parameters the model captures both low- and high-level audio characteristics. Experimental evaluation was carried out on five benchmark datasets (CVoice Fake, FoR, Deepfake Voice Recognition, ODSS, and CMFD), where the proposed model achieved classification accuracies of 97%, 90%, 96%, 97%, and 95%, respectively. Furthermore, when compared to eleven state-of-the-art methods, the proposed model demonstrates superior performance with an overall ROC-AUC of approximately 98%. In addition, a comprehensive feature-wise ablation study was conducted to assess the contribution of each feature set, confirming the robustness and reliability of the proposed framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.