ArticleScientific reports2025
A dual path graph neural network framework for dementia diagnosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The AHEPA EEG benchmark: setting the standard for machine learning in dementia diagnosis, a scoping review.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2026Article
- Knowledge-Guided Deep Learning with Clinical EEG Biomarkers for Automated Dementia Detection and Staging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Beyond complex architectures: a streamlined CNN pipeline for robust Alzheimer's disease classification from brain MRI.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- CNN-based framework for Alzheimer's disease detection from EEG via dynamic mode decomposition.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dementia typically results from damage to neural pathways and the consequent degeneration of neuronal connections. Graph neural networks (GNNs) have been widely employed to model complex brain networks. However, leveraging the complementary temporal, spatial, and spectral features for diagnosing neurocognitive disorders remains challenging. To address this issue, we propose a Bi-path Multi-scale Graph Neural Network (Bi-MCGNN), which integrates two paths : one focusing on time and spatial relationships, and the other on spatial and frequency patterns. By unifying these pathways, Bi-MCGNN integrates diverse brain features into a single framework. In order to more effectively represent brain networks, we designed specialized correlation matrixs to reinforce the constructed graph. We then performed multi-scale graph convolution to analyze brain connectivity at varying resolutions-from fine-grained to more extensive patterns, and ultimately employed an attention mechanism to enhance features across different domains. Extensive experiments on two real-world datasets demonstrate that our model outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.