ArticleScientific reports2025
A cadaveric study of ultrasound guided nonincisional trigger finger release with newly developed threads.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toward a Phenotype-Driven Continuum Model in Trigger Finger: Proposing a Sonographic Framework for Personalized Management.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided non-incisional thread trigger finger release on cadavers using a newly developed domestic thread (Smartwire-01). Ultrasound-guided non-incisional thread trigger finger release was performed on 12 fresh cadaveric hands, including 12 thumbs and 48 long fingers. Two experts, experienced in an ultrasound-guided thread transecting technique, performed the procedures independently. The distal-to-proximal and proximal-to-distal approaches were performed in 6 hands each to determine which is safer and more effective. After the procedure, anatomical analyses were conducted by a blinded anatomist. The presence of a dissected A1 pulley and any damage to adjacent structures were assessed. Among the 60 cadaveric digits, 52 (86.7%) showed complete transection of the A1 pulley. The success rate for the thumb (66.7%) was relatively lower than that of the other fingers (91.7%). The distal-to-proximal approach showed a higher success rate (96.7%) compared to the proximal-to-distal approach (76.7%), with a near-significant difference (p = 0.052). Anatomical analysis revealed clear and sharp incisional margins of the transected A1 pulley, with only 1 minor flexor tendon injury observed, which occurred with the proximal-to-distal approach. Ultrasound-guided non-incisional thread trigger finger release using Smartwire-01 is a safe and effective procedure when performed with the distal-to-proximal approach, particularly in long fingers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.