ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of spring festival on pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing first embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between season and pregnancy outcomes in fresh embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate whether the Spring Festival has an effect on the outcomes of patients undergoing their first embryo transfer (ET) via in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 11,625 first ET cycles were performed at a university-affiliated hospital between January 2014 and March 2022. Women who underwent ET during the peri-Spring Festival periods were designated as the Festival Group, while the remainder were categorized as the Non-Festival Group. Multivariate logistic regression and propensity score matching (PSM) were applied to assess the impact of the "Spring Festival Effect" on pregnancy outcomes. Prior to PSM, patients in Festival Group had lower clinical pregnancy rate (44.39% vs. 52.50%, P < 0.001), implantation rate (34.41% vs. 40.43%, P < 0.001), ongoing pregnancy rate (38.71% vs. 47.15%, P < 0.001), and live birth rate (37.33% vs. 44.82%, P < 0.001). After controlling for confounders, a similar trend remained in the PSM analysis with matching ratios ranging from 1:1 to 1:4. In the multivariable regression analysis, the Spring Festival was found to be an independent risk factor for poor prognosis. These findings indicated that sociocultural events, represented by the Spring Festival, decreased the chances of IVF/ICSI success, underscoring the importance for clinicians and patients to be more vigilant with healthcare during major social events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.